Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Antrel Rolle


HC79

Recommended Posts

what did you expect him to say? Our defense is a doormat for the team to walk all over?

IMO, there's a difference between saying the Cats were lucky and saying the AZ defense was a doormat. It sounds like he was a bit disrespectful.

Beason walked that line when he said the NYG RBs were good, but that 250 of their yards were solely the defense's fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said on ESPN First Take that it was careless plays on the Cardinals part that let us get back in the game. He said they had us dialed the entire game on offense and that he's seen our running backs slice teams, but we didn't do that against them.

Ya until Deangelo woke up and destroyed teams...I love this kinda bulletin board material makes my man Smitty Pissed more than usual..cant wait!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said on ESPN First Take that it was careless plays on the Cardinals part that let us get back in the game. He said they had us dialed the entire game on offense and that he's seen our running backs slice teams, but we didn't do that against them.

If "careless plays" means "tackling like wacky wavy inflatable arm flailing tube men" I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...