Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reg season vs Playoffs


Recommended Posts

Some guy on Reddit made this point I didn’t even think off.
 

Quote: It’s the man on man D. Works great during the regular season.  Not so much in the playoffs. When we fall apart we end up leaving someone wide open to score.

 

we are one of the only teams that play man defense. In the regular season it really does work with 82 games. Works well vs bad teams and sometimes vs good teams. But when it breaks down, it’s looks bad. In the playoffs, everyone is good for the most part, but once you get to high teams playing high end hockey, man on man breaks down very fast. The rags play a 3-2 or 2-3 zone however you look at it. Makes it very hard to get grad As unless force you way to the middle or net front. Most teams used to play man on man and it’s gone away.  That could be the exact reason why we just disappear in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was saying this the other day. Last man to man defense that won the cup was in 2010 I think. If you're not perfect the system doesn't work, or at the very least you're giving up grade A chances. I think we need a Igor type goalie to make it come together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief_Chokeaho said:

We are doing fine on defense. That’s not the issue, clearly. Special teams and finishing are what is plaguing the team. 

Will agree to disagree on this one. They really should switch to a zone style defense because man defense just doesn’t win in the playoffs. The bigger issue is from the athletic article I posted yesterday. The canes prioritize every shot on goal possible versus creating scoring chances. That’s really what needs to change. Alho has yet to score in the series while having a ton of assists. Also should be our leading goal score easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense is doing their job, without Pesce. Rags are struggling to even enter the zone 5v5. 
 

We have scored zero PP goals out of 15 tries in 3 games decided by 3 goals. How you can even begin to blame the defense before that is wild speculation at best. The defense has played well enough to win the series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chief_Chokeaho said:

Our defense is doing their job, without Pesce. Rags are struggling to even enter the zone 5v5. 
 

We have scored zero PP goals out of 15 tries in 3 games decided by 3 goals. How you can even begin to blame the defense before that is wild speculation at best. The defense has played well enough to win the series. 

Oh I can blame them in spots. We are having major defensive breakdowns leading to goals. Burns is having a horrible playoffs.  Tony is horrible. We are allowing 3.5 goals a game. Honestly, if it wasn’t for Koochie or Freddie, it would be 6-7 goals a game. Even our radio guys Tripp Shane and the couple local podscasts talk about how back our defense is playing.   It’s breakdown after breakdown.  The only reason these are 1 goal losses vs 3-4 is the goalies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All three games we have had sub .900 goaltending from Andersen and PK. Goaltending is reason number 3 we aren’t winning this series. 
 

1. Special Teams 

2. Finishing 

3. Goaltending 


This is all my opinion though. I don’t find joy in arguing about why we are losing so I’ll leave it at this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chief_Chokeaho said:

All three games we have had sub .900 goaltending from Andersen and PK. Goaltending is reason number 3 we aren’t winning this series. 
 

1. Special Teams 

2. Finishing 

3. Goaltending 


This is all my opinion though. I don’t find joy in arguing about why we are losing so I’ll leave it at this. 

Special teams is indeed 1. No question. I’d say it’s the style of pucks on net vs creating chances is two. It just doesn’t work in the playoffs against elite goalie play. That’s been the same since 19. Run into an elite goalie, get blanked. That’s the because the offensive style allows the goalie see all shots.  The goals we have scored have been sexy tips or deflections.  Goalie play has been good. Not great. But it’s like the allstar game. The best goalies let up 6-7 goals. Why?? No defense.  Our defense while good in some spots really has been a let down. Watching Burns halfass a clear or Slavin chasing or Tony d really doing nothing is tough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...