Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has anyone here ever met David Tepper in person?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Waldo said:

I have no idea how they could fake the height like they do with the weight but if you figure that out Im listening, he doesn't look 5'10" to me either.

His height is an issue because he doesn't have the wheels to escape and make room to throw like Murray. What he can't see during plays is the issue and it shows on film. The 2 first interceptions prove this and showed how bad the entire thing really was.

Responding to faking height. If you had some tightly wound braids on top of your head, be about the only thing that comes to mind that might get you a little extra. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2024 at 7:01 AM, Waldo said:

I have no idea how they could fake the height like they do with the weight but if you figure that out Im listening, he doesn't look 5'10" to me either.

His height is an issue because he doesn't have the wheels to escape and make room to throw like Murray. What he can't see during plays is the issue and it shows on film. The 2 first interceptions prove this and showed how bad the entire thing really was.

 

This is just my speculation. Maybe he was wearing insoles inside his socks. Ain't no way he's 5'10", maybe 5'9" and something in the morning but flat 5'9" or less by bedtime. 

And let me tell you a couple of three things: we have top-five elite quarterbacks in the league, and we got this other pygmy thing in Charlotte. Historically, Madden always said short signal callers are nothing more than glorified Pop Warner quarterbacks. Listen to me, they let anybody and everybody get on the roster in Charlotte. The way they do things is all f--ed up. Plain and simple, we let Bryce help us tank, and we rebuild with whatever picks he gets us. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Madden, 100.

Bryce needs to start all games this year no matter which end is up.

Only exception is if he gets injured and we start winning. What can you do then? Keep him out and keep winning. Or if not too much damage is done, get him back on the field ASAP. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

I agree with Madden, 100.

Bryce needs to start all games this year no matter which end is up.

Only exception is if he gets injured and we start winning. What can you do then? Keep him out and keep winning. Or if not too much damage is done, get him back on the field ASAP. 

 

Oops, I forgot to add that my post was meant to be a cheeky play on the character of Phil Leotardo from the Sopranos. Madden never said what I said he said, but the sentiment in my post remains the same.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...