Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mardy Gilyard SHOULD be the Pick..


DelhommesTheMan

Recommended Posts

Please let these Colt McCoy rumors be false. We need another playmaker on offense and Gilyard is going to be the real deal. Watch some of his college highlights it just screams Carolina Panthers at you, im not kidding. Not too mention he's a good return man..forget Tate, this is the guy Carolina has too get. Best part is we may even be able to trade back alittle and still get him since theres a lot of talent left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious what's everyones knock on Gilyard? It's not like the guy doesn't suit us in more ways than one...We need a playmaker, not another possession receiver..

I like the guy alot.....but I just have always liked Golden more. I can see how Gilyard would be a better fit here, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious what's everyones knock on Gilyard? It's not like the guy doesn't suit us in more ways than one...We need a playmaker, not another possession receiver..

Skinny, average hands, average speed. Desean Jackson without the 5th gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree on not trading up for a QB, and i would rather take Clausen if we were trading up, not McCoy! But again, i dont want a QB, Tate, Benn or Gilyard would make me happy at this point...But knowing Fox and what we have lost this offseason a trade up likely means defense..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...