Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney & Fox speak after the draft


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

as follows from http://twitter.com/cpanthers:

Fox: "I'm a firm believer that competition @ positions brings out the best in guys."

Hurney said Tony Pike, like Clausen, was the best player on the board when the Panthers picked him. "He was too good a value (to pass up)."

Hurney also said that Jordan Pugh will be a safety. He played cornerback at Texas A&M.

Hurney: "To draft well, you have to train yourself to go by the board, & if there's huge separation, take the best player."

Hurney emphasizing that they feel good about Moore & Cantwell, and that the picks of Clausen/Pike had nothing to do with them ...

(cont.) just that Pike and Clausen were too good to pass up at those draft spots relative to the grade the Panthers gave them.

Fox says DE Greg Hardy "has the skill set that we're looking for ... for a 6th-round value, those guys don't come down the pike very often."

Fox on whether Clausen could have chance to start in 2010: "Those guys answer those questions by competing, & we haven't had practice yet."

Fox said he talked with Matt Moore twice, & it "went very well," but he didn't want to divulge the details of the conversation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kthnx.

What did you expect them to say? "We think Moore and Cantwell suck so we drafted two more QBs"? Wake up.

Do you really expect the undrafted free agent QB with a one year tender to get the nod over the top 10 QB that slid to the 2nd round? They didn't take Clausen to be a backup. You Moore nut huggers are in for a disapointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...