Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Original stars of hit movies


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

very cool, but the Back to the future one is wrong. Eric Stoltz was cast as Marty McFly, and filmed a couple of scenes before Michael J. Fox decided to do it after he turned them down. Actually, they shot a good portion of the movie with Stoltz.

Never heard of Ralph Macchio even sniffing the part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a website dedicated to this.

http://www.notstarring.com/

Some interesting stuff.

Some of the memorable ones I've seen were Chris O'Donnell as jack in Titanic, Tom Selleck as Indiana Jones or Jeremy Irons as Hannibal Lecter.

The most ironic one, of course, is OJ Simpson as the Terminator.

From what I understand, had it been Will Smith as Neo in the Matrix, Morpheus was slated to be Val Kilmer. You could argue that might have been a better combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts:

Tom Cruise + Kevnin Bacon's hair = Ben Stiller

Kevin Costner and Keanu Reeves are very opportunistic dudes. Parlayed some rejected roles into huge hits. Is there a word for guys who hang close to the attractive guy in their clique to hit on the girls he rebuffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thoughts:

Tom Cruise + Kevnin Bacon's hair = Ben Stiller

Kevin Costner and Keanu Reeves are very opportunistic dudes. Parlayed some rejected roles into huge hits. Is there a word for guys who hang close to the attractive guy in their clique to hit on the girls he rebuffs?

Vulture?

There's some roles I wish actors would have been turned down for. Coster as Robin Hood is one of the biggies, though that movie sucked for lots of reasons other than just him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at those posters, wasn't Stuart Townshend originally cast as Aragorn in LOTR?

Ugh. That wouldda sucked. Viggo Mortenson owned that part.

I know David Bowie was supposed to be the Elf King (name escapes me) but I think Hugo Weaving was a better choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...