Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With all the new first year players...

Galvatron

By Galvatron,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Galvatron Newbie

Galvatron

Posted
Posted

Who would you like to see get Rookie of the Year and who do you think has the best shot?

Personally, I would like to see LaFell or Edwards get it. That means the run game's firing and whoever is QB is playing lights out.

IF Clausen starts, he probably has the best opportunity, though I would rather see him develop first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest silver82blade

Guest silver82blade

Posted
Posted

rookie of the year for the team, or for the league? i don't think any of them have a decent shot at a league award. maybe clausen does if he starts the vast majority of the year, but that's unlikely. the rookie with the best year as far as the team goes will probably be lafell 'cause he'll see the most playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

I think due to how we should use him (everywhere we can) I would go with Edwards. He should get plenty of chances at recieving, running, and returning and hopefully some wildcat and trick passes. I just hope he turns into Josh Cribbs in the return game and Harvin in the slot. How could I possibly be disappointed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...