Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which rookie will have the best season?


Razzy

Recommended Posts

Should be interesting to see who is the most (immediately) productive in this batch of rookies. Obviously the team is looking for our new WRs to make some sort of impact but a lot of the rookies should see significant field time should they make the team. Does Clausen see playing time? Do Hardy or Norwood prove a terror in the backfield? Does Pugh step in when Godfrey goes clubhanded again and outplay him?

The logical choice is one of the recievers as it is the position of most need and someone should get lots of playing time, but recently Fox/Hurney have been pretty good at drafting defensive players, especially in the back 7.

I have to go with Edwards. Lafell will touch the ball more, but I think Edwards is really going to help out at KR and that's going to have a big impact on this team. If Moore get traded or fails, then my pick is Clausen. Even if the kid seems like a bit of a pretentious fratboy douchebag, he will do well in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None will have much of an impact this season. Receivers not drafted in the first round do nothing their first years and Clausen/Pike probably won't play. Norwood will be a player, but he's going to find it hard to find the field with as deep as we are at linebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being able to rotate in at SLB or DE should get Norwood some field time on pass plays. Hopefully (knock on wood) TD's injury doesn't return and we don't need to count on him to play full time though. I agree that none of the rookies will have too huge of an impact, which is another reason why I chose Edwards for the KR. Of course, last year I wouldn't have thought Martin or Captain would have as much impact as they did, and I was surprised by how little impact Goodson had after being so highly touted in the offseason. This team is indeed very deep at many positions on defense, but there should be a lot of rotation in "The Committee" this year.

Regardless whether any of them make an impact, who do you think will have the best season out of the rookie class though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an interesting question. Edwards may have drawn the most attention but his lack of bulk will hurt him once things become more physical. I'll have to wait and see how he reacts to bump and run, getting smashed by a safety etc.

My pick right now would be LaFell just because he seems to have the biggest chance of starting. My dark horse is Pugh just because he could win a safety spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Greg Hardy was a steal of the draft and since hes not going to be starting he will be healthier than hes ever been and playing at full speed as a situational pass rusher. I think that along with coach Baker is going to make this kid have the best rookie season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None will have much of an impact this season. Receivers not drafted in the first round do nothing their first years and Clausen/Pike probably won't play. Norwood will be a player, but he's going to find it hard to find the field with as deep as we are at linebacker.

Yeah that Jonny Knox really sucked last year. Fail.

Edwards has a shot to be a really good player. If he continues the way he has so far in Camp I might forget all about what we gave up for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..Receivers not drafted in the first round do nothing their first years ...

Not trying to be funny, but you need to tell that to DeSean Jackson, or even Johnny Knox (who would have done better if Cutler hadn't had tunnel vision, and if Knox hadn't been injured)). Tell that to Austin Collie. Now I could probably go on. Granted, I suppose that these players weren't world beaters, but they did do something. They made key plays. To say they do "nothing" in their first "years" is inaccurate. "To say they do "nothing" in their first "year" is inaccurate. It depends on the receiver, the QBs and the coaches (to be more prolific and creative in their thinking).

Hearing our FO (well, Hurney) say that they want more balance in our offense this year, I not only expect LaFell to make key plays, but Edwards as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...