Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

mass gainers

Saint J

By Saint J,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Joscott Newbie

Joscott

Posted
Posted

I prefer cytogainer, at least thats what I used the last run I had at it. Never really had monster, but I like it over true mass and up your mass.

Of course if you are not eating right and have a strict routine, you'll get fat quick.

Remember that the best protein comes straight from lean foods and no supplement can beat that, so make sure you combine this with the gainer.

On a side note: NOxplode was a crazy experience. It had a crazy bad taste that was really strong, but adding 10lbs in barbells was no effort what-so-ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I'm more with Pstall on this one. Fug mass. Guys that look like Jersey Shore ****** with the fake ass muscles, 9 times out of 10 I could kick their asses. It just shows they're compensating for lack of fighting skill by trying to look physically larger, or compensating from lack of mass below the belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joscott Newbie

Joscott

Posted
Posted

I'm more with Pstall on this one. Fug mass. Guys that look like Jersey Shore ****** with the fake ass muscles, 9 times out of 10 I could kick their asses. It just shows they're compensating for lack of fighting skill by trying to look physically larger, or compensating from lack of mass below the belt.

Well a lot of people don't take mass gainers to get huge like those guys. The idea is that you do a bulk phase followed by a cut phase. Muscles need calories and protein and thats what these gainers provide.

A lot of the huge guys you see don't do it on mass gainers, believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Well a lot of people don't take mass gainers to get huge like those guys. The idea is that you do a bulk phase followed by a cut phase. Muscles need calories and protein and thats what these gainers provide.

A lot of the huge guys you see don't do it on mass gainers, believe that.

But the one's who aren't using mass gainers have fat. Like you said, you need protein and calories in your diet, which means unless your eating special diet foods your probably getting a lot of fat too. They don't have that ridiculous definition. If a guy looks like he got his muscle on a farm, I'll leave them alone. If a dude looks like he spends all day alternating between the gym and tanning booth, I'll make him choke on his Prada sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joscott Newbie

Joscott

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I know what you're saying. Anyone staying on mass gainers for an extended period are setting themselves up for trouble.

For some of those guys, the shots in the butt really don't help.

I like the Popeye ones, all arms, no body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Benjamin Solak on Panthers draft needs

      By csx · Posted

      OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • strato
      Benjamin Solak on Panthers draft needs

      By strato · Posted

      Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • strato
      2026 Win predictions from DraftKings

      By strato · Posted

      I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...