Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

mass gainers


Saint J

Recommended Posts

I prefer cytogainer, at least thats what I used the last run I had at it. Never really had monster, but I like it over true mass and up your mass.

Of course if you are not eating right and have a strict routine, you'll get fat quick.

Remember that the best protein comes straight from lean foods and no supplement can beat that, so make sure you combine this with the gainer.

On a side note: NOxplode was a crazy experience. It had a crazy bad taste that was really strong, but adding 10lbs in barbells was no effort what-so-ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more with Pstall on this one. Fug mass. Guys that look like Jersey Shore ****** with the fake ass muscles, 9 times out of 10 I could kick their asses. It just shows they're compensating for lack of fighting skill by trying to look physically larger, or compensating from lack of mass below the belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more with Pstall on this one. Fug mass. Guys that look like Jersey Shore ****** with the fake ass muscles, 9 times out of 10 I could kick their asses. It just shows they're compensating for lack of fighting skill by trying to look physically larger, or compensating from lack of mass below the belt.

Well a lot of people don't take mass gainers to get huge like those guys. The idea is that you do a bulk phase followed by a cut phase. Muscles need calories and protein and thats what these gainers provide.

A lot of the huge guys you see don't do it on mass gainers, believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well a lot of people don't take mass gainers to get huge like those guys. The idea is that you do a bulk phase followed by a cut phase. Muscles need calories and protein and thats what these gainers provide.

A lot of the huge guys you see don't do it on mass gainers, believe that.

But the one's who aren't using mass gainers have fat. Like you said, you need protein and calories in your diet, which means unless your eating special diet foods your probably getting a lot of fat too. They don't have that ridiculous definition. If a guy looks like he got his muscle on a farm, I'll leave them alone. If a dude looks like he spends all day alternating between the gym and tanning booth, I'll make him choke on his Prada sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know what you're saying. Anyone staying on mass gainers for an extended period are setting themselves up for trouble.

For some of those guys, the shots in the butt really don't help.

I like the Popeye ones, all arms, no body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...