Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are 23rd ranked team on Madden 11 w/ a 75 rating


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

thats 3 lower than in Madden 10. not that it matters, just thought id share since I know some of us play madden.

AFC EAST

New York Jets 89

New England 86

Miami 78

Buffalo 67

AFC NORTH

Baltimore 90

Cincinnati 86

Pittsburgh 84

Cleveland 70

AFC SOUTH

Indianapolis 91

Houston 78

Tennessee 77

Jacksonville 74

AFC WEST

San Diego 85

Denver 78

Kansas City 71

Oakland 71

NFC EAST

Dallas 87

New York Giants 81

Philadelphia 80

Washington 76

NFC NORTH

Minnesota 88

Green Bay 87

Chicago 77

Detroit 68

NFC SOUTH

New Orleans 92

Atlanta 83

*Carolina 75*

Tampa Bay 69

NFC WEST

Arizona 79

San Francisco 79

Seattle 75

St. Louis 66

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6264588.html?tag=topslot;title;2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't really expect much with an inexperienced QB(note: inexperienced, I didn't say bad.) and only 1 star WR.

it is surprising to see the Panthers ranked so low though. despite a lot of rookies/etc, there are still a lot of star "elite" players that I would expect to raise the team to at least 80. Between Beason, Davis, Gamble, Marshall, Smitty, the entire offensive line, double trouble and at least an 80ovr QB...

oh well. as long as I have 1 good WR I'll always do fine in Madden.

are Armanti's ratings out yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great thing about our rating is that I'm more than confidant it will go up. I expect something around an 82-86 by this time next year through roster updates. I hope they put Jonathan Stewart in the 90's with D-will from the get-go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hate everything that madden stands for. They have a total monopoly on tye market but most of their customers are children so nobodyy does anything about it. I haven't played it since 2005. The quality is horrible. It'd be a hell of a lot better if the didn't have to make one every year and if they had some competition.

I'm writing my congressman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't really expect much with an inexperienced QB(note: inexperienced, I didn't say bad.) and only 1 star WR.

it is surprising to see the Panthers ranked so low though. despite a lot of rookies/etc, there are still a lot of star "elite" players that I would expect to raise the team to at least 80. Between Beason, Davis, Gamble, Marshall, Smitty, the entire offensive line, double trouble and at least an 80ovr QB...

oh well. as long as I have 1 good WR I'll always do fine in Madden.

are Armanti's ratings out yet?

Armanti is at 60 overall so far.

Do your part, wont you?

http://maddennfl.easports.com/draft.action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hate everything that madden stands for. They have a total monopoly on tye market but most of their customers are children so nobodyy does anything about it. I haven't played it since 2005. The quality is horrible. It'd be a hell of a lot better if the didn't have to make one every year and if they had some competition.

I'm writing my congressman.

I think Madden should be a bi-annual game at the very least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some argue that we have 2 top 5 RBs in the league yet jstew is never any higher than 88...its true madden does hate Carolina. They obviously hate the chargers also, an 85 come the f*ck on their team is too talented to be ranked so low. Yea the Saints will be the most used team online, just because of their ratings...only bitch players choose the best teams always, I've used 1 team other than the panthers once since I've been playing madden online (Broncos).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...