Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are 23rd ranked team on Madden 11 w/ a 75 rating


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

thats 3 lower than in Madden 10. not that it matters, just thought id share since I know some of us play madden.

AFC EAST

New York Jets 89

New England 86

Miami 78

Buffalo 67

AFC NORTH

Baltimore 90

Cincinnati 86

Pittsburgh 84

Cleveland 70

AFC SOUTH

Indianapolis 91

Houston 78

Tennessee 77

Jacksonville 74

AFC WEST

San Diego 85

Denver 78

Kansas City 71

Oakland 71

NFC EAST

Dallas 87

New York Giants 81

Philadelphia 80

Washington 76

NFC NORTH

Minnesota 88

Green Bay 87

Chicago 77

Detroit 68

NFC SOUTH

New Orleans 92

Atlanta 83

*Carolina 75*

Tampa Bay 69

NFC WEST

Arizona 79

San Francisco 79

Seattle 75

St. Louis 66

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6264588.html?tag=topslot;title;2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't really expect much with an inexperienced QB(note: inexperienced, I didn't say bad.) and only 1 star WR.

it is surprising to see the Panthers ranked so low though. despite a lot of rookies/etc, there are still a lot of star "elite" players that I would expect to raise the team to at least 80. Between Beason, Davis, Gamble, Marshall, Smitty, the entire offensive line, double trouble and at least an 80ovr QB...

oh well. as long as I have 1 good WR I'll always do fine in Madden.

are Armanti's ratings out yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great thing about our rating is that I'm more than confidant it will go up. I expect something around an 82-86 by this time next year through roster updates. I hope they put Jonathan Stewart in the 90's with D-will from the get-go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hate everything that madden stands for. They have a total monopoly on tye market but most of their customers are children so nobodyy does anything about it. I haven't played it since 2005. The quality is horrible. It'd be a hell of a lot better if the didn't have to make one every year and if they had some competition.

I'm writing my congressman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't really expect much with an inexperienced QB(note: inexperienced, I didn't say bad.) and only 1 star WR.

it is surprising to see the Panthers ranked so low though. despite a lot of rookies/etc, there are still a lot of star "elite" players that I would expect to raise the team to at least 80. Between Beason, Davis, Gamble, Marshall, Smitty, the entire offensive line, double trouble and at least an 80ovr QB...

oh well. as long as I have 1 good WR I'll always do fine in Madden.

are Armanti's ratings out yet?

Armanti is at 60 overall so far.

Do your part, wont you?

http://maddennfl.easports.com/draft.action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hate everything that madden stands for. They have a total monopoly on tye market but most of their customers are children so nobodyy does anything about it. I haven't played it since 2005. The quality is horrible. It'd be a hell of a lot better if the didn't have to make one every year and if they had some competition.

I'm writing my congressman.

I think Madden should be a bi-annual game at the very least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some argue that we have 2 top 5 RBs in the league yet jstew is never any higher than 88...its true madden does hate Carolina. They obviously hate the chargers also, an 85 come the f*ck on their team is too talented to be ranked so low. Yea the Saints will be the most used team online, just because of their ratings...only bitch players choose the best teams always, I've used 1 team other than the panthers once since I've been playing madden online (Broncos).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...