Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Voters Approve Plan for New 49ers Stadium


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

060910-voters-approve-header.jpgnewinterior.jpg

In a critical city-wide election on Tuesday, voters in Santa Clara approved plans for a new stadium for the San Francisco 49ers. The election clears the way for the project to move forward with the goal of opening the facility in time for the 2014 season.

“For almost a decade and a half, the San Francisco 49ers and our faithful fans have dreamed about playing at home in a world-class stadium, and now those dreams are closer to reality,” said team President and CEO Jed York. “We can now proceed with our plans to build the premier, open-air sports and entertainment venue in the world.”

Tuesday’s victory comes after an extensive grass roots campaign effort. Over 700 people from Santa Clara and throughout the Bay Area volunteered their time in support of the election.

“We are as thrilled by the results as we are humbled by the effort that so many people put into its success,” York added.

On the heels of Tuesday’s victory, the team today announced the launch of a website for fans: www.49ersNewStadium.com. The website is designed to help fans understand the selection process for seats at the new stadium, including a waitlist for fans that are not season ticket holders at Candlestick Park. The website also includes the latest images of the stadium design, and answers to frequently asked questions about the new stadium plans.

Next, the team and the City will finalize all project approvals and finance construction of the stadium. The goal is to begin construction of the stadium in 2012. Centrally located in Santa Clara, the stadium features easy highway and transit access for fans throughout the Bay Area. The completion of this state-of-the-art facility will secure the team’s long-term future in the Bay Area. Once the new stadium in Santa Clara opens, the team confirmed that its name will remain the San Francisco 49ers.

“We recognize that there is still a lot of work to be done, and it is now our responsibility to finish the job by delivering on the remainder of the plan,” said York. “But, the best fans in the NFL deserve the best stadium, and our new home will continue to make them proud to cheer on the San Francisco 49ers for generations to come.”

More...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been to Candelstick a many of a time, it is indeed a frozen asshole. Pac Bell made it actually enjoyable to go to Giants games; until ofcoarse you realize that you are watching baseball.

Santa Clara aint too far, but San Fransisco delegation are still a bunch of cheap bitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have been great to keep the team closer to San Fran. I've been to candlestick a few times as a kid. Even back then it was a craphole. I'm psyched the 49ers are getting a new place. They really need it. Screw the SF gov't on pricking it up on the plans to rebuild. Santa Clara is a nice place though. The new stadium should be pretty awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it has even half the technological amenities that Cisco Field in Fremont was going to have, it will be sweet. The 9ers have always been my secondary team, but I might actually have to go to games with a new stadium. Can't go wrong with a stadium that is 15 minutes away from Google, Yahoo, EA, Oracle, Cisco, etc. Should have no shortage of advertising and promotional partners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have heard yes the stadium is crappy and is also a pain in the ass to get to. Im suprised San Fran has kept a team this long. I am shocked the city has not banned football for being to violent and discrimatating for there is no trans gender players on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...