Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Moore actually become the QB?


Huffgolf30

Could he take over?  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Could he take over?

    • Yes
      34
    • No, he's not the guy we need
      19
    • Maybe, but should come in 2nd string behind jake next year maybe taking over...
      31


Recommended Posts

i want him to be the QB

realistically, he's not ready YET

but, if delhomme starts out bad next year (IF he's still a panther) moore will come in

I think most of us want Moore to be the guy at some point. It's clear that he's probably not ready to start yet, but with the amount of poise and confidence he has, it's clear he's got a lot of potential.

While he may not have the best range or accuracy in the league, he's a super young QB that came with a box full of intangibles. If that's not enough to get people excited, I don't know what is. Will he turn out to be good? Maybe, but I'm glad our team isn't banking on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah i'm ready for him to play,the question is are we ready to endure the growin pains......after tonight i'm defiantly ready

We may have issues at QB, but this team, as a whole, is pretty good. I feel like we're set up to compete for a Lombardi for the next 4-5 years. We have a great offensive line (Assuming we keep Gross), a two headed monster in the backfield, and a good core of a defense that just needs to be fine tuned as far as personnel goes. (Schemes are something else though... :-/)

Endure the growing pains? Let the Lions do that. Whoever is behind center next year needs to be someone who can, at the very least, manage the game. I don't think Moore is ready to do that. If anyone, McCown probably has a better shot at being able to do it. However, I'd rather have Jake back next season than to start McCown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...