Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My girlfriend wants to experiment with girls. (Please Help)


P-paw

Recommended Posts

Well, my girlfriend told me today that she'd like to try "things" with other girls. We are both relatively young, but I'm still not sure what to think of the matter..so i was looking for a few second opinion's about this. She said there would be no emotions attached, but I still feel in some way that I would be getting cheated on. I'm not sure if its because in a way I'm jealous or what. But, to be honest...I don't know what to think...and I was just looking to see what some others thought. Here is some random information..

She said that if I was not able to be understanding and what not..she'd want to break up with me...and find a guy that IS. I don't understand un-emotional sex. Well, any help ladies and gentleman? (serious answers please)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my girlfriend told me today that she'd like to try "things" with other girls. We are both relatively young, but I'm still not sure what to think of the matter..so i was looking for a few second opinion's about this. She said there would be no emotions attached, but I still feel in some way that I would be getting cheated on. I'm not sure if its because in a way I'm jealous or what. But, to be honest...I don't know what to think...and I was just looking to see what some others thought. Here is some random information..

She said that if I was not able to be understanding and what not..she'd want to break up with me...and find a guy that IS. I don't understand un-emotional sex. Well, any help ladies and gentleman? (serious answers please)

Any kind of love without passion

That ain't no kind of lovin' at all,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how old you both are, but it sounds to me like she probably has a girlfriend is is either Bi or Gay. That GF is probably telling her how great it is to be with another girl who understand a woman's body.

If you like this girl, let her experiment and see if she comes back to you. More likely she wil find out the "grass isn't greener". But be prepared, this may take a while. Many women who are bi-curious, find that it isn't all that it's cracked up to be. Some really find what they are looking for.

It may take a few months to over a year. You have to decide if you are for sticking around to see how things turn out.

Good luck at whatever you decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would really get the details on how this might benefit you before you make your final decision. This is a good problem to have. Yes, I think it's stupid she'd break up with you for not being okay with it but it's also one of those things you might regret in the future if you don't see it through. Imagine hitting one from behind while she's slaying the other girls clam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like its already bothering you and nothings even happened yet. There is no doubt that the vagina is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than the penis. If she figures that out you will be the one hurting while she will be out having wild crazy hot lesbian sex. I would try to scale back your feelings a little and let her do it. You might get introduced to a whole new experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How young is young? From my point of view, that is of an old married guy... I'd say go with Dimbee's advice... if she's talking experiment with you involved, by all means go for it... if it doesn't work out with you and her, so be it. I don't like the ultimatum part of it however... very immature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...