Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Medal of Honor beta

Zaximus

By Zaximus,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Anyone playing this? I've been trying to find a beta key but no luck and it seems Amazon is out (so you can't pre-order and cancel trick). I'm bored and want something different to try.

I've read mixed opinion so far. Some say it's really bad and more like a "alpha" version with bad graphics/sound/gameplay. Some say it's a mix of MW2 and BFBC2, and some say it's just a copy cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Anyone playing this? I've been trying to find a beta key but no luck and it seems Amazon is out (so you can't pre-order and cancel trick). I'm bored and want something different to try.

I've read mixed opinion so far. Some say it's really bad and more like a "alpha" version with bad graphics/sound/gameplay. Some say it's a mix of MW2 and BFBC2, and some say it's just a copy cat.

Go to Gamestop, preorder the game for $5, get your beta code and try it for yourself....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoDatJorts Newbie

WhoDatJorts

Posted
Posted

to me, it seems exactly like bfbc2. I don't like it too much. IO played about 2 hours of the beta and it got me convinced to not buy the game.

It's much more like MW2 than BC2. I have been in the PS3 beta for a couple of weeks. I think I am going to skip this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugor Hill Collaborator

Hugor Hill

Posted
Posted

It's much more like MW2 than BC2. I have been in the PS3 beta for a couple of weeks. I think I am going to skip this one.

I've been playing the PC beta, and its nothing like MW2 on there. weapons fire different, no prone(which I dont really care for anyways), gameplay just feels more like bfbc2, and add to the fact that DICE it making the mp for it, it will more like bfbc2 then MW2. Maybe its different for console uh....er players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I got a key and well, game is pretty terrible for sure. I think they'll fix it up though, why have a beta like this and not do that. It's more like an alpha for sure. It's not as polished as like, the World at War beta was when it came out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Grand Master

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted

I got a key and well, game is pretty terrible for sure. I think they'll fix it up though, why have a beta like this and not do that. It's more like an alpha for sure. It's not as polished as like, the World at War beta was when it came out.

If WaW hadn't been polished that would have been reason for concern, the game was basically a ww2 mod of mw1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoDatJorts Newbie

WhoDatJorts

Posted
Posted

I've been playing the PC beta, and its nothing like MW2 on there. weapons fire different, no prone(which I dont really care for anyways), gameplay just feels more like bfbc2, and add to the fact that DICE it making the mp for it, it will more like bfbc2 then MW2. Maybe its different for console uh....er players.

I really meant the gameplay. Small maps, twitch shooting, stupid melee button location. It really is nothing like BC2. I have wasted a ton of my life on BC2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Why are PC gamers so insecure??

I am fine with my consoles. I mean, it's not like i am here telling you how awesome the Wii is.

I don't think it's insecure as much as it's the game plays differently (as all shooters do) on the PC. While I prefer PC myself if a game is good I'll play it, console or not.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      Dan Morgan on Pat McAfee

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Draft picks are better for cap management and production always outperforms athleticism over time.  
    • CanadianCat
      Dan Morgan on Pat McAfee

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • Crixtala
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Crixtala · Posted

      all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
×
×
  • Create New...