Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Delhomme


littlebigman89

Recommended Posts

Jake is a manager, and that's good enough. With this running game.

I agree with that, however, we can't have those two stupid throws that Delhomme made. Not to mention that one drop back in the first half where he took a sack instead of throwing it away. It's these little mental things that keep Delhomme from being a very good QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude honestly you could argue the INTs weren't his fault. the first one was a really tight but smith should've caught it. i dont think he realized the CB was so close to him.

the second one should've been a catch, but it bounced off (king's?) hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • combined production of the tight end group would’ve been near the top of the league if assimilated into one do it all player there’s nothing to suggest Canales doesn’t like tight ends. 
    • Rams ran more 13 than any team in the league last season. Seahawks were 4th last I checked. Be at the vanguard of how the league is transitioning and don’t get sucked into forcing a pick for a LB that can’t turn or an edge with historically stubby arms. 
    • He's not high on my list but you won't find me complaining if we draft him and he becomes an All-Pro TE. We have plenty of room on this roster for talent but we're not going to fill every need we have in the draft. We'd be dumb to go into this draft feeling pressed to fill needs. Just take the BPA at a position of need with every pick. We have enough needs there should be options at or near the very top of our board that also address a need.
×
×
  • Create New...