Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore vs NFC Starting QBs

BeasonforPrez

By BeasonforPrez,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

BeasonforPrez Newbie

BeasonforPrez

Posted
Posted

have there been enough matt moore threads started this week than any other time in the past year? Had enough? Have about one last one? How bout comparing our starting qb against the rest of the nfc team by team? I am so bored that I will go through with this? I think so, I think by seeing how our team is stacked vs other teams will open up some eyes. Let's start!

ARIZONA= Matt > Leinart, hands down

SEATTLE=Matt > Hasselback, old qb on his last leg

SAN FRANCISCO=Matt > Alex Smith, this is a joke of a qb

ST LOUIS= Matt > Bradford...bust rookie qb?

Chicago= Cutler > Matt...high risk but tons of yards

Minnesota= Favre > Matt....can't compare to a legend yet

Detroit= Matt > Stafford....again questionable 2nd year production

Green Bay= Rodgers > Matt lol can't argue that one

Tampa bay= Matt> Freeman.....that kid is a joke

New Orleans= Brees> Matt....yeah..

Atlanta= Ryan=Matt

Philadelphia= Matt> Kolb...........kolb is a scrub

Washington= Mcnabb> Matt......veteran can't argue

Dallas= Stadium caved in, forfeit season

New York= Eli = Matt Game managers

That's my opinion, matt is a better qb than half the nfc equal to in terms of potential as many of the qbs highly regarded in the conference. For those who say we are screwed, look at the conference and think again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvandenberg Newbie

tvandenberg

Posted
Posted

Dallas= Stadium caved in, forfeit season

New York= Eli = Matt Game managers

Clearly Romo > Matt (sadly), and even though I can't stand baby Manning, I'd take him over Matt, too.

Other than that, listing the teams like this does show how weak some of the other NFC QBs are.

Last things last, we have nothing to worry about in our QB role. We just need some good game management, and that starts with the calls by Davidson -- who I'd like to see get a (tiny) bit more aggressive this year, especially once we're behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BeasonforPrez Newbie

BeasonforPrez

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I notice a lot of people make accounts just to start threads. Is it because they have other accounts and don't want to use them or what?

yup for fear of losing a high enough account to troll status. you never know what the huddle mood is, its like the huddle is on her period somedays

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

Rodgers, Brees, Favre, Romo, McNabb, Eli, Ryan are all better, or more "proven" than Moore. I don't know how you can say Eli is a game manager after he put up career high numbers with random receivers no one knew about before last year. Ryan also has more experience, and a better receiving core to work with than Moore.

I think Hassleback, Smith, Stafford, Cutler, and Kolb are at the very least equal(or better.) Hassleback, if he can stay healthy, will have a good year. Alex Smith put up great numbers last year in what, 10 games? He'll have a better offensive line to work with too. I'd rate Moore and Kolb the same, although Kolb has a lot more to work with in the passing game. I think Stafford puts up great numbers this season with an improved receiving core and more experience. I'm not a Cutler fan, and I don't think he's a top quarterback in the league, but the guy has one of the worst receiving cores in the league, and arguably THE worst offensive line. It's hard to be successful in that situation.

I think he'll be better than Bradford, Freeman, and Leinert though. Bradford is on the Rams, Freeman is on the Bucs, and I doubt Leinert will even be starting after the bye week. I bet you John Skelton is starting by the end of the season for the Cardinals.

Moore just doesn't have enough experience to be labeled better than a lot of quarterbacks. The potential is there, but he needs to prove it first(and I think he will.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BeasonforPrez Newbie

BeasonforPrez

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Rodgers, Brees, Favre, Romo, McNabb, Eli, Ryan are all better, or more "proven" than Moore. I don't know how you can say Eli is a game manager after he put up career high numbers with random receivers no one knew about before last year. Ryan also has more experience, and a better receiving core to work with than Moore.

I think Hassleback, Smith, Stafford, Cutler, and Kolb are at the very least equal(or better.) Hassleback, if he can stay healthy, will have a good year. Alex Smith put up great numbers last year in what, 10 games? He'll have a better offensive line to work with too. I'd rate Moore and Kolb the same, although Kolb has a lot more to work with in the passing game. I think Stafford puts up great numbers this season with an improved receiving core and more experience. I'm not a Cutler fan, and I don't think he's a top quarterback in the league, but the guy has one of the worst receiving cores in the league, and arguably THE worst offensive line. It's hard to be successful in that situation.

I think he'll be better than Bradford, Freeman, and Leinert though. Bradford is on the Rams, Freeman is on the Bucs, and I doubt Leinert will even be starting after the bye week. I bet you John Skelton is starting by the end of the season for the Cardinals.

Moore just doesn't have enough experience to be labeled better than a lot of quarterbacks. The potential is there, but he needs to prove it first(and I think he will.)

your either in it, or your not, so where does your loyalty in the moore train stand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...