Matt Moore vs NFC Starting QBs

[Dpantherman]

yeah, its your sarcasm right back at ya... give me one meaningful game matt moore has played in while your at it

our 09 season was already over, so those games dont count either

What are you talking about? Matt Moore has STARTED in the NFL. Bradford has not. meaningful? ok, none of the teams Matt Moore faced in 2009 wanted to win. thats why they had their starters in the all of the games (except the last one) for the entire game. They really wanted to risk injury in a meaningless game. get real

[Dpantherman]

I really can't believe you said that Sam Bradford is better than anyone after a couple of preseason games....

[Chaos]

There are four Matt's in the NFC as starting QB's - 16 teams and four Matt's. One quarter, or 1/4, of the conference is lead by a QB named Matt. Two from the South, two from the West. Therefore, none from the East or North.

Sorry guys, I just can't get past that mind-F'er. I want to break this down statistically so bad, but I'm trippin'.

[Mother Grabber]

Bradford is an unknown. To say otherwise, either god or bust, is pure speculation.

[Dpantherman]

As I said before. get back to me in October. but say to Bradford> Moore is a complete joke. point blank

[marcopolo]

I really can't believe you said that Sam Bradford is better than anyone after a couple of preseason games....

I cant believe some of you all are saying matt moore is better than so and so without any stats and rational, at least i gave you stats.

Matt Moore first year as a starter - 0 TDs

Sam Bradford, first year as a start - 2TDs

Therefore... two is better than none.

My logic is just as good as yours!

[Dpantherman]

I cant believe some of you all are saying matt moore is better than so and so without any stats and rational, at least i gave you stats.

Matt Moore first year as a starter - 0 TDs

Sam Bradford, first year as a start - 2TDs

Therefore... two is better than none.

My logic is just as good as yours!

apparently you are having trouble reading. I have said TWICE (this would be the third time) to get back at me in OCTOBER. did you read that? and once again. 0 NFL starts vs. 8. Preseason. its PREEEEEESEEEASSSON. These games Do not count

[marcopolo]

The games may not, but it gives you a good indication where your team stands. Green Bay put up 59 points tonight, compared to our measly 3pts the other game. Games may not count, but its a pretty good indication of your team.

Rams also put up 36 pts toinght as well.

[Dpantherman]

The games may not, but it gives you a good indication where your team stands. Green Bay put up 59 points tonight, compared to our measly 3pts the other game. Games may not count, but its a pretty good indication of your team.

and who put up those 59 points? aaron rodgers, an early mvp candidate w/ 2 full nfl seasons under his belt. what is your next point?

[Dpantherman]

i meant helped of course. Rodgers didn't score 59 by himself

[marcopolo]

Rogers wasnt the only one... go look at some scores

Rams 36/Pats 35

Packer 59/Colts 24

Hell, we cant even score a touchdown.

[marcopolo]

Our defense had better be for real, or we are screwed.

[Dpantherman]

Rogers wasnt the only one... go look at some scores

Rams 36/Pats 35

Packer 59/Colts 24

Hell, we cant even score a touchdown.

You are discussing Team efforts. not QB performances. and with your logic, the Rams will be better than Patriots this season. You keep avoiding the simple fact that Sam Bradford is a rookie. and had a good preseason game. And still hasn't started a real NFL game. Im going to quit trying to get that in your head, because obvious you seem to keep dodging it. Again for the 4th time....come talk to me in October.

[marcopolo]

How am I dodging?

I still havent hear a peep of statistical information from you all.