Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's preseason, but is our defense really this good?


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

It's preseason. Which means

1. No/very little gameplanning. This is especially important, say that your free safety is the weak link on your defense. The offense would run routes to try to match their playmakers up against your weakest guy exposing chinks in your defense.

2. It's not starters vs starters so defense rank does not matter in preseason. Starters play what? half, a quarter or a game? sometimes only a few series? And the rest is 2nd and 3rd string vs 2nd and third string with a few exceptions.

Who was the #1 defense in preseason in 2009, and how well did their defense do during the regular season?

Edit:

It was Baltimore for AFC in total defense and Minnesota for the NFC.

Jets were top 5 though.

Still those other two were good defensive teams during the regular season after a solid preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's true that offenses aren't game planning to beat the defense, but when our starters manhandle other team's starters, that's a good indicator of what's to come. Our D-line trashing the Titans O-line and eating Chris Johnson is just our guys beating their guys. Not much game-planning involved there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are getting good pass rush without blitzing you can't fake that. Plus the LB are not getting killed by TE's and pass too RB out of the back field.

Also our Dline is good pass rush against some pretty good Olines.

Jets, Ravens, and Tenn have some good olines and we still got too the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

forget top 10, we're going to be a top 5 if this is real.

these guys are amazing. these guys have really rallied around the loss of peppers and now that they are no longer standing in his shadow, they are getting a chance to shine. :cornut:

The way I see it, with all the interchangeable parts and capable backups that relieve the starters on a down-by-down basis...

Hellz yeah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...