Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For all the people that say Smitty makes Delhomme


panthers1789

Recommended Posts

I never said it was Smitty's fault, I said if Smitty wasn't here he wouldnt make some the throws he makes and would make less mistakes.

Just look at 2004, Smitty missed the whole season and Delhomme had his best year, 3886yards 29tds 15ints

Sounds like a plan. Get rid of your best receiver because your QB won't stop locking onto him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I ever say get rid of Smitty?

You rednecks are so f*cking retarded.

Surely you can understand the faulty logic in your statement. Forcing a ball somewhere it should not be is always the quarterback’s fault. You can’t blame Steve Smith just because he is so good he makes Jake throw to him.

That would be like me blaming delicious reuben sandwiches for my weight problem. They are so tasty they made me eat them!

(I don’t like reubens nor do I have a weight problem, but I think you catch my drift.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That Smitty makes Delhomme struggle because he has too much confidence in him.

That's a strange way to look at it. Delhomme makes himself struggle. He can throw it wherever he wants. Maybe Smith should tone down his awesomeness so Jake won't target him as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...