Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good things from the game


Retemnav

Recommended Posts

Yes, it was a terrible loss, but there were a few positives.

1) We made it to the red zone multiple times. No, we were not able to punch it in, whether because of shoe string tackles or poorly advised throws that resulted in INTs. However, red zone success tends to regress towards the mean, so there is no reason to think that we will fail to score as many times as we did this game.

2) Special teams were not atrocious. Kick and punt returns actually looked pretty good. Coverage was good. We had one bad snap in the rain, but otherwise they did not look terrible.

3) The running game will not be that bad every game. There were multiple times where it looked like a run was about to spring for a big gain and a great tackle was made, and that will not be the case every game.

4) The run defense held the Giants to 3.3 yards per carry, and was dominating in the first half.

5) We had the lead, on the road, going into halftime, against a good team that has made the playoffs 4 of the last 5 years, and only missed them last year because of a complete collapse down the stretch.

These are positive things that we can hopefully carry forward. This is not to say that we will be a great team going forward, but there is every reason to believe that the final score was not indicative of the way the team played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we made it to the red zone because of turnovers and special teams play. how often did we start from the 20 and make it to the red zone.

moore made some bad decisions and those floaters have to go but i was most disappointed with our secondary the most. we're much better than that. we finished the season ranked 4th in pass defense last year.

we missed otah

and play calling was horrible especially in the red zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Defense - minus Godfrey I thought looked good. 2nd half I think was just the result of being on the field too much. I would like to see more from the pass rush but overall they looked much better than I thought they were going to be (my outlook prior to preseason based on the roster).

2. Mike Goodson - showed some flashes.

3. Steve Smith - not too much rust. I wonder how healthy he is though.....a lot of downs like Moore's first pick he wasn't even on the field for. I doubt he would have been that winded. I also recall some early downs were the only WR was LaFell.

4. Jarrett - one game he just needs starter reps to prove himself. THEN people can bash him if he doesn't.

5. Dan Connor - didn't mean to list him last. Solid performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too much good comes from a loss. Its not like this was Pee Wee team playing a Middle School team with much bigger kids and saying here are the things you did good. This is professional football. These players get paid to win not to loose. I would prefer to post about the things the team did bad and need to be corrected.

Why did we quit running the ball. You know teams get tired in the second half and we have two of the best backs in the league. We were only two scores down in the 3rd quit on the run. The passing formations allowed the Giants to double Smitty and pin their ears back and go after Matty. It worked almost got him killed.

Run and pass blocking. Too bad to even discuss.

Wide Receivers minus Smith. They cannot get open.

Matty looked loss. See above. He does not have confidence in his oline and Wide Outs. Don't force passes in the Red Zone. The 9 missing points would have made the game a lot different in the 4th.

No pass rush on defense. Looked great in the preseason but allowed Manning too much time in the pocket.

Marshall and Godfrey. Both looked like rookies. Marshall sucks in pass coverage and Godfrey forgot how to tackle. He looked scared to make contact. (looked like some of the kids on my sons Pee Wee football team). I give Marshall a little slack because of the lack of pass rush.

Retemnav, you made superb comments on the things the Panthers did right in the game. I hope this continues but there are a lot of things that need to be corrected.

One last thing. We should not read too much into this opening game. A win would have been nice but look what the Seahawks did to the 49ers. Probably their only win of the season.

Sincerely,

Forum Everyday Reader.

(See number of Posts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...