Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Harris on WFNZ now

Guest

By Guest,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

great interview, though.

incredibly disappointed with the loss, still bitter.

he said they did change to man coverage in the second and was able to shut down the card offense pretty well. lesson learned there, imo. man>zone.

he said he liked the system because it allows them to play. said the problem was more because of player mistakes than the system.

still said that it was just a bad game and they picked the wrong day to have a bad game.

he wants peppers to be back and said that he was a very big part of the team not only on the field with the way he plays but what he did in practice and meetings in being a vocal leader.

he said there will be some tweaking in the defense.

said that even though the coaches didn't get on to marshall with the unsportsmanlike conduct he and other players got him and he knew how bad that was.

one thing that i loved was how he said the situation is eerily similar to what he had in chicago in 2005. bears had a bye week and the panthers came in and beat them in chicago. they came back the next year and went to the superbowl. he said he mentioned that in the locker room and just smiled.

panthers are not done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShutDwn Newbie

ShutDwn

Posted
Posted

one thing that i loved was how he said the situation is eerily similar to what he had in chicago in 2005. bears had a bye week and the panthers came in and beat them in chicago. they came back the next year and went to the superbowl. he said he mentioned that in the locker room and just smiled.

panthers are not done.

That tough NFC North and the NFC west sure did pose a challenge the next year right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I think he is just trying not to step on any toes. That zone defense that allowed the Cards to own our secondary the first half was all Turg and Fox, not the players.

Thats true, but even I, a football novice, noticed several blown coverages in the first half (or the first quarter, I couldn't watch the game any more and deleted the recording)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...