Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Out of 3, Let Gross walk


NewEnglandAFChamps

Recommended Posts

I would let Gross walk, it is the only logical smart thing to do. You still have Ryan Kalil, Jeff Otah, and Travelles Wharton. All probowl snubs in my book. You keep them and Let Gross walk. Gross can't rush the passer and he can't pass the ball to Steve Smith and Moose. You don't do anything stupid. You don't be an ass and let Delhomme go, or try to do something dumb like looking in FA or draft for a QB. Jake has qualities you can't draft or find in FA. You keep him if you want any shot at a title. And on the other side, you keep Peppers because he still had 15 sacks, probowler and is one of the rare freaks athletically off the edge that you will ever see. He is one of the keys to every playoff run Carolina makes, as well as Jake. You can still win withouth Gross, but can't without Peppers or Jake. And besides, with runningbacks as good as DeAngelo and Jonathan, they will still be dominant regardless.. especially if you are still running behind Otah, and Gross has false start issues like crazy anyway. Hopefully Fox and Hurney think like me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now why the hell would Peppers be gone? think about what you just said. What wins championships?

With his comments, it seems like he doesn't like something about our team, coaches or scheme or whatever it may be. If he wants out then let him, I don't want a player who doesn't want to be here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You let Gross walk and you still have Otah, Wharton and Kalil. 3 of the best linemen in the NFC? whats so hard to understand about that. Letting Peppers go for a bunch of good players will be a mistake. Thats not how you build a team. You let him go, it better be for another stud either at his position or another. You always keep the core of your team in order to win championships. We let Milloy, Washington, Antoine Smith and others walk. But we kept Seymor, Brady, and etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You let Gross walk and you still have Otah, Wharton and Kalil. 3 of the best linemen in the NFC? whats so hard to understand about that. Letting Peppers go for a bunch of good players will be a mistake. Thats not how you build a team. You let him go, it better be for another stud either at his position or another. You always keep the core of your team in order to win championships. We let Milloy, Washington, Antoine Smith and others walk. But we kept Seymor, Brady, and etc

Were not saying we want peppers to go, but it does seem at this point he doesn't want to play here. In that case you sign your LT and keep him then trade the player who doesn't want to be here. I say we cut lewis,landon johnson, lucas, Hackett, and a player or two then trade peppers (if he doesn't want to be here) Pick up a big free agent or a couple of middle tier ones, then use the draft to shore up our defense and maybe pick up another option at WR and OG.

Defensive pressure using just the front four is a whole line thing, you can't just have one guy and expect him to do it by himself, he's got to have a supporting cast to be consistent. If he want's to go I'd rather us have a lineup of something similar to this. Johnson, Kemo, Wilfork, fa or draft pick. with brayton, lewis and taylor being the main switch out guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our best unit and saving grace this year was the running game, not the Defense

I'd rather keep the line together, hopefully gross won't want a HUGE contract because there will be some crappy teams throwing bucketloads of money at him

If we can trade peppers we would get a 1st rounder(and a few other picks), plus a huge amount of cap room to use.

I'd rather keep peppers and gross. But considering what it would potentially take to keep peppers. I'd rather keep gross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok, I didn't know he no longer wanted to play in Carolina any more

He hasn't said it, but it was "I want to do what's best for the team" types of comments. That coupled with the fact that he turned down a deal that would make him the highest paid DE in the league, people conclude that he wants out of carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...