Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hmmmm...... Wait a sec!


NFL Executive

Recommended Posts

ummm....really anyone watching matt moore yesterday couldn't honestly feel good about him. i just don't see how that is possible. there is no room for optimism left, imo. zod has nothing to do with that. it was apparent yesterday that moore isn't who we had hoped he was.

the offense looked better with clausen than it has all year. that was also very apparent. clausen comes not just with more hype, but with more to bring to the table. it's obvious the team wants him for the future, with or without fox. it was only a matter of time before clausen was going to get the job. might as well give it to him now.

thanks for thinking this was your special idea, though. may you find whatever praise you are looking here for that helps make your life complete.

this.. I'm pretty sure people were posting about Clausen before Zod put a stamp on it. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main reason people were more hesitant to pull Delhomme is because of his history with us. I said in another post yesterday I like Moore, he seems like a good guy and after his games last season I wanted him to come in this season and light it up, but if he plays bad and get benched I'm all for pulling him because he hasn't connected with us. He has never seemed like our "starter" or our "leader."

With Jake even when I was sitting in the freezing cold at that Arizona game I had full faith in that guy because I KNEW what he was capable of, he took us to the Super Bowl he consistently gave us wins he was advertised our tasty Bojangles Chicken and Biscuits he was the face of our franchise. Most people here had loyalty to Jake, Jake was our guy and that why I and alot of others hesitated to call for Jakes head (at least for the first 3-4 games of last year). With Matt its just not the same, he gave us hope at the end of last season but I don't think he's connected with us he always has seemed kind of disposable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like a lot of things in today's economy, market concentration is a huge issue in the vet space. Mars (yeah, the chocolate company) owns roughly half of them with their control of Banfield and VCA as well as numerous smaller chains. Oh, and all that Royal Canon food the vets are prescribing and recommending? Yeah, that's owned by Mars too. Don't even get me started on the racket that is "prescription" dog food and how incredibly uneducated the average vet is on basic pet nutrition. Back to the actual clinics... private equity ghouls who care about literally nothing but profit own another 30%. Now you're down to roughly 20-25% of clinics that aren't under the thumb of Mars or private equity.
    • I just listened to Devil in the Desert.  😳
    • like any profession, a lot of them are very greedy and balloon up bills.  My buddy is a vet.   When he was first starting out he had BIG issues with the vet he was employed with because he was expected to drive up bills.    He now owns his own practice driven by that very reason.  Good man that wants to sleep good at night....doing what he set out to do at a young age (with the same reason in mind, to help animals and people).  But per him, a HUGE % of small animal vets are just gouging the f out of people.  like most things, I want the most mom and pop variety I can find.  The bigger practice, like most businesses, it more likely is owned and operated to make as much money as possible at the end of the day. 
×
×
  • Create New...