Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

fox defend staff use of peppers.


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

The link:

Coach John Fox said today the Panthers will do what’s best for their team regarding Julius Peppers and defended his staff’s use of the four-time Pro Bowl defensive end in its defensive scheme.

When asked to respond to statements by Peppers’ agent, Carl Carey, that Peppers wants to move on to another team and believes he must do so to reach his full potential as a player, Fox told the Observer:

“All I can say is we’ve got other options and we’re going to do what’s best for our football team. I haven’t heard that from Julius’ mouth, so I’m figuring it’s all speculation. I can’t say it isn’t true. … But we have other options.”

The Panthers have the option of placing their franchise tag on Peppers to either trade him or try to force him to play under a one-year tender offer, which is required to be around $17 million.

Carey said he told Panthers general manager Marty Hurney of Peppers’ position on Thursday in Housto, where Carey lives. Hurney was in town attending practices for the East-West Shrine all-star game.

Carey told the Observer Saturday that Peppers is intrigued by the possibility of playing in a 3-4 defense and that Peppers believes he’s maximized what he can do with Carolina and wants to play in a different defensive system.

Fox’s response to that?

“I’ll just say this,” he said. “We’ve never held players back.”

Peppers had a career high 14 ½ sacks this and holds the team career record with 70 ½ sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on-- BEFORE I read it, I am gonna take a crack at what Fox says;

Q- How do you feel about Peppers comments out not reaching his potential?"

Fox- "well, we have had Julius here for my whole tenure, he has made four pro bowls, Defensive player of the year and has been an all pro. I would say that we have done something right"

Q- What do you say about the scheme"

Fox- I have full confidence in my coaching staff. Our defense has ranked in the upper tier of the league, and my staff does an excellent job of putting our guys in position to make plays.

Q- "what do you say about Julius wanting our of Carolina"

Fox- Peppers i his own man, he has played very hard for us and has excelled here.

Ok- I have to go read now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good one.

I guess you would have ran the same defense that we ran vs AZ.

ROFL

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

it's impossible to pressure a qb when his #1 wr is wide open. a cyborg reggie white would've had the same game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

The answer is yes, other coaches get more out of worse players than Peppers because they know how to put them in positions to succeed.

Even if you drop Peppers from the whole argument, would our other players be better in a different scheme?

It is obvious our scheme sucks, so I really don't even care who is on the defense, coaches should be able to do something that works with their personnel.

You can't just assume Peppers is going to make every play just because he is a beast. And if you see him getting handled, do some other poo, confuse the offense, DO SOMETHING. Not just drop back in a soft zone and hope our only player makes something happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

We are talking about Peppers and his lack of pressure, when the only man who needed to be defended was a WR, who was never covered. It didn't take Warner 5 seconds to locate Fitz. Fitz was open within a 3 step drop.

Peppers is now a scapegoat in the Arizona debacle. You have to be kidding me. We are all entitled to our opinions, and clearly you opine Peppers to be very overrated. Clearly we disagree, and that's fine. But, Peppers didn't throw 5 INTs and fumble once, (4 times within a given Red Zone). Nor did Peppers allow Fitz to go off for 180 yards. Nor did it matter that he didn't sack Warner as many of their plays were off on 3 step drops.

To the thread title...of course Fox is going to defend their use of a player. Who wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Peppers is making a mistake. He is not built to play OLBer...he's built to be a DE in a 4-3.

Either way, the Panthers tried lining him up in just about every possible position in the last couple of years except for MLBer, corner, and safety. There were even times when it looked like Peppers was allowed to free lance...that second Saints game comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...