Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

True or False (food for thought for entertainment purposes only)?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

1.Colbert and Carter weren't so bad after all.

2.Dan Henning is a god!

3.A half of Pep is better than no Pep at all.

4.Jerry Richardson is the alter ego of Al Davis (with similar results).

5.One Hoover and one Muhammad does not an O-line make (or break).

6.Otah can apparently move earth (and men) like Bagger 288

7.Clausen is Carr's fraternal twin (not identical, mind you, but...).

8.At BOA, blackouts are closer to reality than black uniforms.

9.Steve Smith has another side that we have yet to see.

10.Foxholes are closer to black holes than assholes.

11. In reference to number 10, Jarrett is either a victim of all three and/or can't tell the difference between the three.

12. Double Trouble has morphed into Double Bubble.

13. Foxes chase their tails too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.Colbert and Carter weren't so bad after all.

False. They were still poo, and were typical Hurney picks at WR. For proper tear inducing perspective, Steve Smith was a Seifert pick.

2.Dan Henning is a god!

False. But he's better than we thought he was. And he has more Superbowl rings than John Fox ever will.

3.A half of Pep is better than no Pep at all.

True. And that frigging hurts.

4.Jerry Richardson is the alter ego of Al Davis (with similar results).

False. Al Davis spends money.

5.One Hoover and one Muhammad does not an O-line make (or break).

True. But no Hoover + no Moose apparently does equal a dropoff.

6.Otah can apparently move earth (and men) like Bagger 288

False. He's just another excuse for people to throw out rather than owning up to the fact that this is still the same predictable offense we've had since 2002, only now with less talent & guts.

7.Clausen is Carr's fraternal twin (not identical, mind you, but...).

False. David Carr is a crime against football, a Leaf-esque bust.

8.At BOA, blackouts are closer to reality than black uniforms.

True.

9.Steve Smith has another side that we have yet to see.

False. Smitty wears his heart on his sleeve.

10.Foxholes are closer to black holes than assholes.

I don't know, but Fox is an asshole I'd like to see shut his Foxhole, & be swallowed by a Black Hole.

11. In reference to number 10, Jarrett is either a victim of all three and/or can't tell the difference between the three.

Both. Jarrett is a victim of poor coaching, poor selection, & his own lack of work ethic.

12. Double Trouble has morphed into Double Bubble.

False. They've morphed into the only thing we've got other than Smith, combined with "let's reduce DeAngelo's carries so we can lowball him or let him walk & say his production was dropping"

13. Foxes chase their tails too.

If you mean go round & round in circles with the same results & never adjusting, hell yes it's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4.Jerry Richardson is the alter ego of Al Davis (with similar results).

False. Al Davis spends money.

7. Clausen is Carr's fraternal twin (not identical, mind you, but...).

False. David Carr is a crime against football, a Leaf-esque bust.

9. Steve has another side that we have yet to see.

False. Smitty wears his heart on his sleeve.

Because Davis Spends money, and J-Rich has turned into J-Poor, that's exactly why they may be alter egos. So different, yet similar in many ways; first and foremost, in their respective products on the field (though their receivers may be a year ahead, and our RBs a year ahead). Just saying.

When referring to Clausen and Carr, I was really not speaking of their success (or lack there-of) on the football field. Jimmy hasn't even had an opportunity yet. Wierd? Again, just saying.

Number 9 is really a trick question (think other side of the field). Very true on one level, and very false on another.

Thanks for answering. That was entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

richardson doesn't spend money? lol.

aside from this year, when has he shown an unwillingness to spend money. we were always at the cap max or pretty well close to it.

once the CBA gets worked out we'll be right back there.

Hell, man, the whole of the NFL is at or near the max. But this thread is more about 2010 than anything else. Some would argue that the Panthers were at a crossroads this year (not saying that I agree, per se), and this is the year that Richardson decided to close the coffers without regard to specific and obvious needs.

It is arguable, but what Jerry did was tantamount to that hot chick teasing the hell out of you, building you up (and even letting you get a little taste), and then forcing you to pull out by saying "Stop!"

That's a crazy ass bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You absolutely can have hope. You can’t convert people though; making advocacy posts are kind of … not reading the room.   I had a small hope that he would be able to at least manage some games and that they could make it work in some kind of no fun to watch fashion.  But honestly I had 100% determined he was not NFL starter material, and I had conviction. So to root for him to marginally succeed goes against the best interest of the Panthers long term, according to my beliefs. I wanted him gone the minute he got here if I am honest.It was up to him to prove otherwise.  He has rarely shown me anything to think I was wrong on his ceiling.  He did show me some courage last year, standing in the pocket and stepping into his throw in the face of pressure - but that has gone somewhere. He made some nice throws last year in places too, but they invested in him on the level of the Atlanta game should be his norm. Good luck seeing that again on Sunday. Still, he did it once, so technically it could happen again. 
    • Damn that was a longer post than I intended, Maybe I should have started a new thread.
    • On that TD, he sure didn't get any help from Scott at FS! While we're pointing out Blue Chips...Horn has proven to be a lock-down, (dare I say)elite CB and DB is one of the best at DT. Which brings me to a topic that has unfortunately been much on my mind lately...2026. Our important (IMO) FAs are: Rico Dowdle - As you pointed out, Etienne is developing nicely and Brooks is still untested potential, so not a big loss. Cade Mays and Brady Christensen - I think we can keep both without breaking the bank. BC tested the market this year and it was all but non-existent. He's a solid backup, but backup linemen don't get paid. Mayes is our only starter on the line who's a FA and he's technically not a starter. Corbett is a FA, but good riddance as far as I'm concerned. He stays hurt and can't snap the damn ball when he is healthy. Hunter Renfrow signed a 1 -year prove it deal, and will resign a team friendly deal again I think. He has repeatedly said that he only wants to play here and is Coker's backup anyway. DJ Wonnum - Solid mid-tier guy that I would like back, but is easily replaceable. I will not cry if he walks. Every other FA is bottom of the barrel roster fillers. As it stands now, we need (in order); QB, ILB, OL/DL depth, secondary depth. If we resign Mays, OL is in tact again and still pretty darned good. Horne, Jackson, and Smith-Wade are solid starters as are T-mac and Coker. We have some promising young WRs in Tremayne and Horn. I see us trying to get a FA Chain mover and/or resign Renfrow. RB room looks really good. TE is a conundrum, Tremble will never be a great pass catcher and Sanders will never be a great blocker. Evans is starting to show signs of life, but not enough to tell yet. This could be another spot we try to upgrade via free agency, having a proven TE could really help our rookie QB.
×
×
  • Create New...