Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Little Boys

Kettle

By Kettle,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Had this argument with my wife.

basically she said that if he was uncircumsized 90% of girls would laugh about his junk to other girls as it is "gross"

I dunno about all that, but it's definitely a surprise if it's not, at least in America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TarPanther9180 Newbie

TarPanther9180

Posted
Posted

women only think its gross cuz they aren't used to seeing it. uncircumcised makes penetrating easier and orgasm more intense. we do already think with our cocks a lot though so increasing the pleasure may be a bad idea.

Who cares what the women think? They should only be worrying about pleasuring us and making sammiches afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

women only think its gross cuz they aren't used to seeing it. uncircumcised makes penetrating easier and orgasm more intense. we do already think with our cocks a lot though so increasing the pleasure may be a bad idea.

I agree about it being gross, they're just not familiar with it.

What I don't get is, if God made us "in his image" and "perfect" why the hell do we have to chop off the foreskin of a newborn baby boy. isn't the foreskin part of the image? Nothing says good job like altering things at birth.

I voted NO on the chop chop, but my vote held no weight apparently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 45catfan
      2025 QB Draft Class

      By 45catfan · Posted

      One word to describe next year's QB draft class...DEEP!  To me, this is Bryce's make or break year.  The organization probably doesn't feel that way and will likely anoint him as the starter to at least 2027 no matter what.  Some of these dude's will likely stay in college, but the bulk of them will be coming out.  Manning and Sellers are two probably staying. That's not to say that the 2027 QB class will be crappy or thin, because I honestly don't know.  It usually does skip at least a year--or more, but rarely two bumper crops of QBs in consecutive years. https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2026/story/_/id/45453107/2026-nfl-draft-quarterback-class-top-prospects-klubnik-sellers-manning
    • MHS831
      Rodgers to Pittsburgh confirmed

      By MHS831 · Posted

    • MHS831
      Canales Addresses CB position

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I think Ransom will be a solid player for us.  He played beside Caleb Downs, the cornerstone of the Ohio State defense last year and some have him as a top 5 pick for the 2026 draft.  He was characterized as the smart, instinctive, versatile safety.   I just don't think S will be a liability unless we have injuries.  I am very interested in seeing what they have in the three UDFA safeties; I see one making the roster. As for CB, I think they are higher on Wade-Smith than most of us are. Again, depth is a concern.  We have to hope Jackson has another solid season and Horn does not injure his leg or toe on one of the yard lines.   I am not sure I would compare it to last season's DL because this year's DL will cover a lot of deficiencies, but I know what you mean---our weak link.
×
×
  • Create New...