Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's Marital Debate...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

OK, my wife and I were having a discussion last week... then she had a girls night out Friday and discussed it with her friends and came back and told me what they all said.

I'm gonna conduct a poll on here and see what you all say.

Question:

On AVERAGE, how many times PER WEEK do you consider appropriate for a married couple to have sex.

This is not how much you are currently getting, but your ideal.

Please post the number, your sex and age and if you are married or not in your response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not married so I have no idea....

when I AM married, I would like it to be at least 2-3 times per week....basing that off of what Klong said aboot guys when they get older and they can't handle as much or need breaks...

but I honestly have no idea.

Are we talking sex and just sex? Or various other things that could possibly lead to sex?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not married so I have no idea....

when I AM married, I would like it to be at least 2-3 times per week....basing that off of what Klong said aboot guys when they get older and they can't handle as much or need breaks...

but I honestly have no idea.

Are we talking sex and just sex? Or various other things that could possibly lead to sex?

Well, I don't want to be any more specific than "sex"... I guess that can mean whatever you want it to mean. I don't want to skew the results.

I think KK may have meant that a little differently than what you're thinking... I think he meant that when guys are young, they can go 2-3 times in one session and as they age, that slows a bit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Extremely difficult (damn near impossible) to do a complete front office overhaul in a single offseason. On top of that though - and perhaps more important - you don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Not everybody sucks. (mind you, I do think this last move successfully rid us of one who did)
    • I think it's more related to the difference between proven talent and projected talent. Our proven talent is quite literally almost nonexistent. Our projected talent could be significantly more. Obviously, it remains to be seen how many DJ Moore's we get and how many TMJ's(not making this position specific, just giving examples of clear progression of careers and talent being realized versus not). This could be an exceptionally terrible, underwhelming, okay, fairly decent, surprisingly good, etc roster. All that has to play out on the field because our known entities in terms of above average caliber NFL players is paltry but most standards. All that digital bloviating to basically say, "Show me." As for Tepper, I genuinely don't think he has meddled that much less and I don't think he has stepped back. I think he just cleaned house of most of the people chirping about it internally while not making himself so publicly visible because he is very aware of the meme he has made himself and this franchise. IMO, he will continue to fug this franchise over because that is who he is as a person.
    • Glad im not watching...  guessing walker out too
×
×
  • Create New...