Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Creepy Gynecologists


LifeisaGarden

Recommended Posts

Ive been in the room with my wife with two OBGYNs. (while she was prego). One did a pelvic exam. Had my face in the corner, fingers in ears going LA LA LA LA LA.

But really, i just wanted to ask both of them, "Why you wanna look at bad poon all day mang?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you really think about it, I bet very few women have a pretty cooter & those fuggers actually chose that profession. YUCK!

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you really think about it, I bet very few women have a pretty cooter & those fuggers actually chose that profession. YUCK!

I think it's the other way around, to guys anyway. We met very few we didn't like!

Unless your first reaction is this,

bgd341.jpg

!BjBjF+wBGk~$(KGrHqYH-DoEt!cqyH6LBLR0kHO!KQ~~_35.JPG

OR this,

drive-thru-tree-nr-Leggett.jpg

Guys and/or Lesbians, can figure something to do with it!

lik1.jpg

khjkhkhj,couples,black,,,white,black,and,white,couple,embrace-cab160a595bd9d03f7a5ac510b016ba5_h.jpg

But you're right on one thing. I 've never met a women that didn't prefer going to another woman doctor for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

What's the difference than a guy looking at porn. Makes him want to go "hit it"! :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

$250k??

poo son, that aint poo for an OBGYN. So in that respect, i guess its worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer a male obgyn over a female one. I've never had any creepy ones. When I was pregnant I was seen by lots of men and women ones and I didn't care for any of the women obgyns. They were kind of cold and less compassionate. Might just depend on the person not the sex of the person.

I love my obgyn. He is a cajun around 35 years old and super nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends on the doctor/nurse. Some male docs I have seen have been pretty worthless and insensitive. They don't get a speculum wedging their lady parts and pinching their cooters. I would like shove that up their bungholes so they gain perspective. I have had more women doctors be very senstive to the patient being displayed on the exam table like a trussed turkey. I have also had bitchy nurse practitioners who make you feel like poo if you have any questions. It's both. It sucks to have to be there every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well when I get a physical I request females just because it feels more natural than a male, but they are pretty bitchy and not very gentle either so I don't think it is a sex thing more of a good doctor/bad doctor thing. This is why it is so hard (and important) to find a good doctor you trust regardless of them being a man or a woman.

I am not trying to sound racist but I would be weary of races being doctors for two reasons. Some foreigners have a weird doctor degree but not an equivalent. Secondly, I am pretty sure there is a race/handicap hiring quota for them like any other establishment. Had someone look at a suspicious mole on me and tell me it's absolutely nothing. Found out a month later it was cancer and needed to be removed by a free doctor in the park. I truly believe that doctor was only there becasue of his race. I called him back and wouldn't you know he no longer worked there.

It is a shame that establishments are forced to hire some people even though they aren't qualified for a fear of a lawsuit or an organization that will be alerted. You can be suspected of being a racist all you want when turning a doctor away becasue they seem suspicious but this is your health, it isn't worth being polite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
    • rippadonn likes him.  That might be a red flag.... https://x.com/rippadonn/status/2042310653176594854
×
×
  • Create New...