Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here's hoping Edwards gets a start at QB this year

Carl Spackler

By Carl Spackler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted

So his inevitable 49 QB rating can hush the App State homers who think he's the savior and is better than Michael Vick. Funny how they say Clausen can't see over the line but somehow Armanti in his diminuitive stature could? Look I'm all for finding the solution on our current roster. But saying Clausen wouldn't cut it with the '08 Lions or Moore is the worst QB ever while touting Edwards' 7 career rushing yards is retarded.

Go Panthers.:cheers2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

So his inevitable 49 QB rating can hush the App State homers who think he's the savior and is better than Michael Vick. Funny how they say Clausen can't see over the line but somehow Armanti in his diminuitive stature could? Look I'm all for finding the solution on our current roster. But saying Clausen wouldn't cut it with the '08 Lions or Moore is the worst QB ever while touting Edwards' 7 career rushing yards is retarded.

Go Panthers.:cheers2:

a 49, dont you think you're being a little generous....:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Why would you ever hope for the failure of a player on your team?

I don't think anyone here wants him to be any less then Steve Smith or Desean Jackson reincarnated, but he isn't a QB in the NFL and our QB performance would get much worse with him under center. Did the kid even take snaps under center his entire career at App.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

Our QB performance would get worse? You really just said that? How is that possible?

They would have to change the play calling to suit his abilities since he hasn't been practicing under center in a run first offense, and I know the creativity involved is beyond our coaching staff. But with both our starting runners out, they have to do something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Our QB performance would get worse? You really just said that? How is that possible?

They would have to change the play calling to suit his abilities since he hasn't been practicing under center in a run first offense, and I know the creativity involved is beyond our coaching staff. But with both our starting runners out, they have to do something.

Exactly what do you want them to do to adjust the playcalling and take advantage of our strengths and playmakers?? Run the fuging triple option....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...