Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peppers


thefuzz

Recommended Posts

Im happy for Julius. John Fox never wanted him or has stood behind him. He deserves to play for a better organization that isnt gonna ditch him the second he slacks off during the playoffs. Julius should look into coming into the NFC North. He's played well against their teams, and chances are he'll receive better coaching (a la Favre in Minny) to take his game to the next level than he's gonna get playing for Fox. Fox is a dumbass, and doesnt have the ability to coach a talent like Julius.

That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though this thread is a shot at KT and I don't understand how he's able to troll all of you so effectively, I was talking to a buddy about Pep today. It was about his production, taking plays off, his pay, etc.

The way I see it, on average Peppers takes over one game a year. It might be a combination of games, but overall his athleticism allows him to tack one win every year on his shoulders. Now if you're an owner, is it worth 16 million to one player every year to guarantee at least one win? I think it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Urlacher had 17 combined tackles today.

Pep had 4...

Urlacher is the MLB. Pep is a DE. You do not expect the MLB to have more tackles than the DE?

No, of course you don't.

Pep did have another sack today. You don't mention that, of course.

The Bears won. Bottom line. Chicago Front Office, Team and Fans are all very happy to have Pep in the Bears uni. 'Nuff said, vajayjay-hurting ex-girlfriend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...