Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we cut Richard Marshall


panthers1789

Recommended Posts

I say cut Lucas, let Marshall have a shot at the #2 CB Spot. Last year, he filled in for Lucas I believe and did a good job. I think he'd thrive in a starter position. He'd train harder, study harder, etc. He's a GREAT tackler too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes horrible, everyone likes to bash Lucas, but forget that Marshall gets burnt even more than Lucas.

Cut or trade Marshall, draft a corner in round 2 or round 1(if we get a 1st rounder for Peppers).

I think that you do not cut your young and taleted players. I know that Marshall regressed this past year but he still show's a lot of promise.

Until we pick a new D cordinator I would think that we wouldn't cut any of our D players, unless someone is obviously overpaid or underachieving, because you do not yet know what your DC's scheme is going to be.

What if we cut Marshall and Lucas and the new DC wants to run an aggresive bump and run with his CB's? Well Marshall and Lucas both excel as physical corners. We just screwed ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Marshall's regression had anything to do with Tim Lewis....

and yeah, I'd get rid of Lucas before Marshall. The latter is cheaper, and younger, and if someone's going to get burnt, I'd rather it be the cheaper younger one.

if he had Herm coaching him, he'd turn into a complete stud.

he makes less annually than dante wesley

lol, awesome then

He's looking to get paid this year! I can see him leaving pretty easily....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It depends on what version of bad we are getting. Can't have the locker room tearing apart over it.
    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...