Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vick watch

Matt Foley

By Matt Foley,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

Yeah and Mangini to the Browns means that Brett Farve and Kris Jenkins are in Cleavland next year. Turdovac to GB means Pep to GB. Shannahan to KC = still a shitty team.

Why in the hell would a hard line disciplinary coach like Singletary want a felon like Vick as his QB? Are you fuging serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matt Foley Newbie

Matt Foley

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah and Mangini to the Browns means that Brett Farve and Kris Jenkins are in Cleavland next year. Turdovac to GB means Pep to GB. Shannahan to KC = still a sh*tty team.

Why in the hell would a hard line disciplinary coach like Singletary want a felon like Vick as his QB? Are you f*cking serious.

Don't kill the messenger. I don't like it any more than you do. But their reasoning is that SF has no QB, and Reeves is perhaps the only coach who might be willing to give Vick a second chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

Don't kill the messenger. I don't like it any more than you do. But their reasoning is that SF has no QB, and Reeves is perhaps the only coach who might be willing to give Vick a second chance.

Dont worry I will only shoot you. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
House Newbie

House

Posted
Posted

Don't kill the messenger. I don't like it any more than you do. But their reasoning is that SF has no QB, and Reeves is perhaps the only coach who might be willing to give Vick a second chance.

Not really shootin' the messenger but I just hate how some of these web sites do absolutly no thinking about what they write. Its damn irratating.

I honestly don't think Goodell is going to let Vick in right away. He will probably give him a year on his own to prove that he can be a good little boy.

Scooby Dooby Doo, Mike Vick Lookin Boy.

99% of the time you make no sense at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

Not really shootin' the messenger but I just hate how some of these web sites do absolutly no thinking about what they write. Its damn irratating.

I honestly don't think Goodell is going to let Vick in right away. He will probably give him a year on his own to prove that he can be a good little boy.

99% of the time you make no sense at all.

Look up the song Lookin boy and you will understand, until then don't speak just listen

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samuel L. Jackson Newbie

Samuel L. Jackson

Posted
Posted

You'ze a broke lookin' boy, joke lookin' boy,

Let me clear my throat lookin' boy,

Spongebob on your shirt lookin' boy,

I play in dirt lookin' boy,

Balled up dirty K-Swiss lookin boy,

Brown dookie stains in yo drawers lookin' boy,

SCOOBY DOOBY-DOOBY-DOOOO! Mike Vick lookin' boy,

Why I won't lose no weight? lookin' boy,

Lookin' real ugly in the face lookin' boy,

Gel lookin' boy, weave lookin' boy,

Need to brush yo teeth lookin' boy,

Boot lookin' boy, soup lookin' boy,

Wearin' green joggin suit lookin' boy,

Say it again! Say it again! Ol' pinky lookin' boy

okay.. I'm not trying to derail this topic, which actually has nothing to do with the Panthers anyway, but whatever..

Seriously.. WHAT THE fug IS THAT IN THE QUOTES?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...