Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bad Calls Hurt Today

Stovewood

By Stovewood,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Stovewood Newbie

Stovewood

Posted
Posted

From the first play today when a roughing penalty should have been called on the Brown's sideline. To that hard hit that caused an incomplete pass in the endzone but instead gave the Browns a TD. To that travisty of justice regarding the sideline catch. Multipule obvious holds that weren't called. Reminded me of the Cowboy's of old referees.

As close as the game was today one of those bad calls could have cost us the game.

I know could'a would'a should'a.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stovewood Newbie

Stovewood

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Rather than "we got screwed" its more hate to see bad calls alter the outcome.

What I really hated was the statement the call, on the hit in the endzone, says about the direction the game is taking. If this rule stands as is; this a season that will change NFL Football and not for the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stovewood Newbie

Stovewood

Posted
  • Author
Posted

They are bad calls in all games. We had our chance and didn't capitalize. It's fate, we are destine to get Luck.

Yeah that was the "should'a, would'a, could'a part of my initial post. Were it any other Panthers team I'd say the would'a capitalzed. Have my doubts about this team.

But HEY! Yesterday's game was fun to watch. Kind'a like the old Cardiac Cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jasonluckydog
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By jasonluckydog · Posted

      Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...