Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone Still Want to Defend Clausen?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Wait a minute.

You're telling me that it is completely and totally acceptable for the ground game, which is the backbone of this offense, to come on late while the QB, whom the offense is not designed around at all, has to play lights out from the start? Even when they're a rookie? That's asinine.

The Bears are airing the ball out. Mike Marz. Enough said, and they STILL have found the endzone more than us. If anything, that makes an even stronger case against the rushing attack here.

Clausen Cause in full effect I see. You're going to excuse the rushing attack for the FIRST EIGHT GAMES OF THE SEASON where we went 1-7? Yet, Jimmy, who hasn't even started in the 8 games that he has played this season (he started 5), is an instant bust and needs to be kicked to the curb because he hasn't shown much promise when the coaching staff only wants him throwing the ball in long yardage situations? Get out of here with that garbage. Having a difference of an opinion is fine and dandy, but when you're going to put unreasonable expectations on a rookie QB and not hold accountable the bread and butter of this offense, that's not even a matter of forming an opinion. That's a chicken with its head cut off (which JC does look like when he's trying to get his ass back in the pocket to avoid anybody that didn't get blocked this time).

all I am saying is the run game has consistantly started slow the past 2 seasons in Carolina. Bulk of the production came in the last half of those seasons. Can't argue that.

I know that the past 4 games (3rd quarter of the season), Carolina has had a top ground game in the NFL during that window.

So, going into the 3rd quarter of the season Clausen should finally know the offense and is given a top ground attack during that window........and he STILL is horrible.

the ground attack was slow getting starting....and a host of other things have been bad this year. HOWEVER, that isn't an excuse for how horrific Clausen has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, and how is he making the pressure effective when Kalil ignores the linebacker blitzing up the middle or stunting in?

Clausen sucks, but let's be honest: so does our pass blocking.

I mean goddamn, what is wrong with our playcalling? our routes take forEVER to develop. grah.

again, Kalil is taking too much crap. Good OL play is all about conistancy and communication. Look at his OGs that have rotated in this season. We never had our RT. OL hasn't played great.....talent isn't the problem. I think they will be fine next year w/ a couple moves in FA next year.

again, the Texans OL complained about the bad rep they got during the Carr era. They had a point. Sure, they were far from good. Carr's play made them horrible. Clausen is doing that this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO Arnold Swartzeneggar wouldnt stand strong in that pocket behind our OL. You get drilled to the ground a few times and see if your trust in that oline dissolves quickly.

you put a good QB behind that OL and everyone looks better. Good/bad QB play has proven to make a huge difference in how an OL appears to perform. There are countless examples that support that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

again, Kalil is taking too much crap. Good OL play is all about conistancy and communication. Look at his OGs that have rotated in this season. We never had our RT. OL hasn't played great.....talent isn't the problem. I think they will be fine next year w/ a couple moves in FA next year.

again, the Texans OL complained about the bad rep they got during the Carr era. They had a point. Sure, they were far from good. Carr's play made them horrible. Clausen is doing that this year.

You forget that we have a reference point. Look how well Moore played behind a solid O-line last season. Now compare that to how terrible he played behind this excuse for a line this season.

This line has ruined Moore and Clausen. Both are scared to stand in the pocket. We've seen how good they both can be when they show confidence. But this season meant they are/were running for their lives.

Our O-line is comically bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you put a good QB behind that OL and everyone looks better. Good/bad QB play has proven to make a huge difference in how an OL appears to perform. There are countless examples that support that.

You are probably right, I didn't even think of this. WOW.

I mean, it is obviously the problem because Matt Moore, who played so well behind that OL last year while he was getting good blocking didn't struggle at all and wasn't getting pounded into the turf every single play this year.

Also, once again, Jay Cutler who was an up and coming QB at Denver with a ton of upside didn't just turn into a steaming pile of poo behind a horrible Bears OL.

Also Matt Schaub, who played well in limited time at Atlanta didn't look like a busted FA until the Texans fixed thier OL blocking problems.

Then there is Matt Hassleback, who was a really good QB when Seattle had one of the best OL's in football, surely he didn't fall off the face of the earth when Hutch left and Womack got old and the OL started plying poorly.

I think I remember a guy named Kurt Warner, he was a great QB in St. Louis then fell apart, not because the OL couldn't protect him, he just sucked all of a sudden. He went to NYG and he still sucked ass because he was so bad that he made the OL look bad. Then he went to AZ and started lighting it up behind an OL that could block for him, surely though, it wasn't the fact that he once again had time in the pocket that caused his resurgence.

Yes, of course, our OL sucks because the QB is shitty. It happens all of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You forget that we have a reference point. Look how well Moore played behind a solid O-line last season. Now compare that to how terrible he played behind this excuse for a line this season.

This line has ruined Moore and Clausen. Both are scared to stand in the pocket. We've seen how good they both can be when they show confidence. But this season meant they are/were running for their lives.

Our O-line is comically bad.

Moore also did a lot of really bad things that had little to do w/ OL play. He made poor decisions and made poor throws to open guys. Also, you aren't taking into account what defenses did differently this year......early in the season Fox even admitted it was pointless watching film on opponents b/c they weren't operating the same when they played Carolina and everyone was playing Carolina the same.

Moore was never scared to stay in the pocket. He stood in the pocket and would step up into the pocket. He have the team a chance. He made a lot of poor decisions and throws.

There are good QBs making plays that have seen similar pressure to what Clasuen has seen this year. They react to it differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are probably right, I didn't even think of this. WOW.

I mean, it is obviously the problem because Matt Moore, who played so well behind that OL last year while he was getting good blocking didn't struggle at all and wasn't getting pounded into the turf every single play this year.

Also, once again, Jay Cutler who was an up and coming QB at Denver with a ton of upside didn't just turn into a steaming pile of poo behind a horrible Bears OL.

Also Matt Schaub, who played well in limited time at Atlanta didn't look like a busted FA until the Texans fixed thier OL blocking problems.

Then there is Matt Hassleback, who was a really good QB when Seattle had one of the best OL's in football, surely he didn't fall off the face of the earth when Hutch left and Womack got old and the OL started plying poorly.

I think I remember a guy named Kurt Warner, he was a great QB in St. Louis then fell apart, not because the OL couldn't protect him, he just sucked all of a sudden. He went to NYG and he still sucked ass because he was so bad that he made the OL look bad. Then he went to AZ and started lighting it up behind an OL that could block for him, surely though, it wasn't the fact that he once again had time in the pocket that caused his resurgence.

Yes, of course, our OL sucks because the QB is shitty. It happens all of the time.

Bears don't have a good OL now. It IS crap. They are worse than Carolina. - Bears are what 9-3? Cutler has had the poo kicked out of him this year but is making plays. Cutler has the 11th highest QB rating behind a horrible OL and garbage WRs.

Getting Carr out of Houston solved a large portion of the "protection issues".

Philly's OL was garbage this season. In fact that is the main reason the fanbase was behind the move to Vick as they thought he he could scramble and survive longer when they collpased....funny how that all changed once Vick stepped on the field. Now they are percieved to be much better.

Clausen sucks. Other problems on the team don't excuse how horrific he is playing. It is comical the excuses people are making for this kid. He is bad. That is it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore also did a lot of really bad things that had little to do w/ OL play. He made poor decisions and made poor throws to open guys. Also, you aren't taking into account what defenses did differently this year......early in the season Fox even admitted it was pointless watching film on opponents b/c they weren't operating the same when they played Carolina and everyone was playing Carolina the same.

Moore was never scared to stay in the pocket. He stood in the pocket and would step up into the pocket. He have the team a chance. He made a lot of poor decisions and throws.

There are good QBs making plays that have seen similar pressure to what Clasuen has seen this year. They react to it differently.

Moore started the season against the Giants letting plays develop and taking shots downfield. His first pick was on Barnidge, IMO, but yes, he made some bad throws.

But then halftime came and the Giants stepped up the pressure. After that, Moore was on the ground every play, picking grass out of his face mask. He regressed during his stint as starter.

He doesn't have a great arm, but he made good decisions when he had some sort of pocket presence. He atleast tried to hit the open man in stride. Compare that to the instant check-down or throw away that we have now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMAO Arnold Swartzeneggar wouldnt stand strong in that pocket behind our OL. You get drilled to the ground a few times and see if your trust in that oline dissolves quickly.

You're right, there's no way Arnold would stand strong in the pocket. Dude's flabby and saggy and old and nasty now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen is a stinker and I knew that before he was drafted but I will not throw him under the Fox bus. I think Clausen is better than he looks but not good enough to be a starting QB in the NFL. Fox is cancerous to this team and it's young players in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how bad was clausen on third down?

Clausen actually converted his first pass on third down, getting 14 yards on a throw to Brandon LaFell. The subsequent 10 chances resulted in a pick-six, an aborted snap, two sacks, five incompletions, and a four-yard checkdown to Dante Rosario on third-and-17.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...