Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone Still Want to Defend Clausen?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

hm, sanchez had a great running game and a great protection last season...now let's look at his stats:

2009 NYJ 15 196 364 53.8 2444 6.7 12 65 20 8 63.0

His stats this year aren't much better than last year. He has turned his TD/Int ration from less than .6 to 1.2 Still not great. The Jets win in spite of him based on great defense. He is completing only 53% of his passes and has a passer rating of 74. With a great team around him he looks okay. But he couldn't take a team on his back and propel them to very many wins.

Although in his rookie year he had 12 TDs passing. Much better than the 1 Clausen has produced in 7 losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His stats this year aren't much better than last year. He has turned his TD/Int ration from less than .6 to 1.2 Still not great. The Jets win in spite of him based on great defense. He is completing only 53% of his passes and has a passer rating of 74. With a great team around him he looks okay. But he couldn't take a team on his back and propel them to very many wins.

Although in his rookie year he had 12 TDs passing. Much better than the 1 Clausen has produced in 7 losses.

yes, the TD number is embarrasing but moore couldnt create much more with his 7 tds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, the TD number is embarrasing but moore couldnt create much more with his 7 tds...

In 5 games he had 5 Tds, if Clausen were doing the same he would have 7 Tds right now not 1. Moore's issue was the Ints- 10. Then again Clausen has 7 Ints without any of the Tds. Seriously when your last and only TD was 2 months and almost 200 attempts ago, that is more than embarrassing. I wonder what the record is???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will because I see something many of you don't, a young QB with little talent around him, bad play calling and a defense that's fading fast.

I remember last year before Jake got yanked, most of y'all were saying "don't throw the ball downfield into double coverage". Another item was "why don't we try a short passing game like the WCO". Now we're doing that and due to a lack of an OL and consistant running game, all I see is the same moaning and groaning for doing exactly what many of you wanted last year--playing it safe.

Granted Jimmy has played far from lights out, but I can see elements of his game that will improve just with experience. With a year under his belt, a healthy OL, revitalized rushing attack and a defense not spotting the opposition a TD on their first drive, I can see where Clasuen will be vastly improved next year.

The one thing he HAS to improve is that awkward-ass throwing motion. That may or may not occur, however, some QBs have thrived with a weired throwing motion.

As for his arm--he has a good arm, not a cannon, but better than most people give him credit for. When he has time and a WR is running deep, he's had the arm to get it there.

I guess I like to play devil's advocate because I was one of the few people not drooling over Moore by season's end citing he had a great set up in front of him wondering how he'd handle adversity. As we saw, Matt didn't handle this year too well with the vets gone and injuries at key positions. If our incumbent QB couldn't keep the sinking ship afloat, how in the heck do you all expect a rookie to do it?

I hope Jimmy gets a fair shake next season. If he stinks it up, then we should start to look elsewhere. Until then, the best thing we could do is get a solid veteran in FA as insurance. Moore I don't think is stable enough to be considered an 'solid vet'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't always wait around to give some guy a "fair shake" when he doesn't take advantage of what he's given even if the situation isn't great, especially if there is a better prospect waiting in the wings.

also, we aren't running a WCO at all. We're running an offense not unlike what we always have, but Clausen dumps the ball off a lot. Passes to a RB alone don't define a WCO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can't always wait around to give some guy a "fair shake" when he doesn't take advantage of what he's given...

also, we aren't running a WCO at all. We're running an offense not unlike what we always have, but Clausen dumps the ball off a lot. Passes to a RB alone don't define a WCO.

Not a WCO per se, but a short passing game just like they started Matt out with last year.

Anyway, not many rookie QBs have historically done well their first season. If so, the they had a good/great supporting cast. I wonder if the bulk of NFL fans wanted to yank their rookie QB after half a season of poor play? I'm suspect to the fact since Jimmy is not a first round pick that some of you are deeming him more expendable opposed to if he were drafted in the first round. I think the frustration would still be there, but I doubt you all would be so gung ho on pulling the plug so early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...