Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Superbowl Thread...


Zod

Recommended Posts

link?

not trying to be an ass, but it's the 1st time ive ever seen that called.

No I don't have a link. I imagine it falls under the same rules dealing with kickers and punters...you can't hit'em because they are defenseless. You don't seriously think they are going to make up rules in the Superbowl do you? LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I don't have a link. I imagine it falls under the same rules dealing with kickers and punters...you can't hit'em because they are defenseless. You don't seriously think they are going to make up rules in the Superbowl do you? LOL.

Is the qb defenseless? Because that roughing call on AZ on Ben was abysmal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they are. The ref blew the call with Warner's incomplete pass that was called a fumble. What I mean is that it should have never had to go to replay. It was clear that the arm was going forward. They have also called absolutely everything that they could possibly call against the Cardinals.

The only reason Warners arm was "going forward" was because he got hit in the side. He was just holding the ball out there and his arm went forward because of the momentum from the hit. That is a bullshit rule, especially if you want to interpret it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I don't have a link. I imagine it falls under the same rules dealing with kickers and punters...you can't hit'em because they are defenseless. You don't seriously think they are going to make up rules in the Superbowl do you? LOL.

kickers and punters are one thing, but the holder has the potential to become a blocker. they dont.

thats why im wondering.

never seen it called. have you?

it didnt even matter in this game, since they still ended up with 3, but this is something new to me, and im looking for details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kickers and punters are one thing, but the holder has the potential to become a blocker. they dont.

thats why im wondering.

never seen it called. have you?

it didnt even matter in this game, since they still ended up with 3, but this is something new to me, and im looking for details.

I can't remember it ever happening, much less being called. I'm only speculating based on how they want to protect players. A holder is pretty vulnerable when he's in that position and could probably get pretty fuged up if he takes a good hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...