Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could we trade down and pick up a second?


KARASMATIC444

Recommended Posts

then send Hurney to the browns, and get him to trade our second for the browns 1st next year. from there take our 1st next year (probably a top 15 pick) and the browns 1st (probably a top 15 pick) and trade it for the number 1 and get Luck?

ok the hurney part was a joke, but the rest is not. im not saying this is a good idea or not, and i know it wont happen, but could it? does anyone have a sheet with the draft values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to trade for the #1 pick. no one.

THIS THIS THIS

I wish people will stop saying trade down!!!! We don't want anybody at #1, what makes you think someone else does, and wants to spend that kind of $$$ (It's all ready been said the rookie won't take place until 2012).

The only way we trade down is if we get raped in the deal. We will not get value for the pick.... period.

There is no one truly worth the #1 pick anymore and number 1 pick money....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to trade for the #1 pick. no one.

Scenario: What IF Harbaugh lands at the 49ers or Denver say within the next 9 days, as Luck's cut off to declare approaches?

And Harbaughs new team behind the scenes wants to trade up to our 1st round pick with whatever offer they might entice us with knowing if Harbaugh can pull off a trade, Luck will declare to partner up with his old coach.........if he doesn't/cant pull off a trade before the 15th were back to square one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone could potentially want #1... Never say never...

That said, this would certainly be a down year in value for it... meaning I don't necessarily think it could happen...

IF IT DOES... it will be because someone bumps their stock up tremendously between now and April, and a team that is run like a team ought to be (meaning they actually make moves to get guys they want) moves up to get them...

Not many teams besides Denver and New England has enough ammo this year alone, but I'd trade down into the mid teens of the first round this year for an extra 1st rounder next year if someone offers us that... Then we'd have 2 shots at getting the guy we want next year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS THIS THIS

The only way we trade down is if we get raped in the deal. We will not get value for the pick.... period.

There is no one truly worth the #1 pick anymore and number 1 pick money....

this...

1st pick is due what? like 80 million this year? that's crazy considering there is no real talent now worth even half that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping a team like the Lions would want Bowers to team up with Suh, The Lions would have a great defensive line and I could see them willing to trade up to get him. I could see a team like Cincinnati needing a DE because of Odoms health. Who knows what will happen. All we can do is hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...