Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming Newton/Fairley/Peterson didn't come out...


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Fairley is a Senior, and Dareus and Bowers have officially declared. I would take one of those three, if Peterson didn't declare.

Blaine Gabbert isn't a bad idea either, but that's a mid-to-late first round choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dareus - DT is needed and he's neck and neck with Fairley as the best DT of the draft. Either would be a reach, but we've got to take someone.

Dareus is a bigger reach than any of the above. My draft board would be like this, assuming no other big name comes out:

Green/Gabbert (haven't decided which yet)

Bowers

that's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dareus is a bigger reach than any of the above. My draft board would be like this, assuming no other big name comes out:

Green/Gabbert (haven't decided which yet)

Bowers

that's it.

Gabbert is in no way shape or form worthy of the #1 pick, Bowers is a one year wonder, Green I can get behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gabbert is in no way shape or form worthy of the #1 pick, Bowers is a one year wonder, Green I can get behind.

Gabbert has all the tools and could be great... He is rushing up the draft boards right now, and is one of the top QBs in the draft if not the top QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gabbert has all the tools and could be great... He is rushing up the draft boards right now, and is one of the top QBs in the draft if not the top QB.

Gabbert is rocketing up the board because he's a physical freak and McShay is talking him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was playing around with the ESPN playoff predictor and it shows if 49ers and Rams finish with same record, the Rams hold the tiebreaker.     
    • This is my thinking as well. Seattle played as good as they could on defense and Panthers still had a chance until those back to back turnovers.  I don't think the Rams played particularly well in their game against us, alot things went our way in order to win.  Someone pointed out the Rams were bad on the east coast road games and Seattle has been the better road team but they just fought a hard contested game against the Panthers, and now they travel to San Fran this week for their biggest game of the season to determine the division and if they are the overall #1 seed in the NFC or will be traveling for the Wildcard weekend.  If they lose they then travel back cross the country to play a team they've just beaten two weeks ago, not saying they won't be favored against the Panthers but the energy of hosting our first playoff game in 10 years along with the get back effect of having just lost to this team could be huge. 
    • I don’t know about shadowing and all that, but according to this, whatever we are doing is working 
×
×
  • Create New...