Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No review?

panthersphan

By panthersphan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

Because the refs decided to stop fuging the Steelers. They were obviously trying to give it to the Cards at the end, and when the Cards wouldn't step up and take it....they took it back.

I will take a double shot of the delusional juice brother...:biggrinjester:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MurkN Community Regular

MurkN

Posted
Posted

Maybe the Steelers took advantage of the shady officiating and sprinted out on the field when such a scenario occured and then took a knee mere seconds from when the replay officials could buzz in to the officials about a review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted

Warner flipped out and yelled for his coach to challenge the first time it happened, and although his coaches could not the second time...Warner said and did nothing other than walk off the field. He knew.

I really don't think it would have mattered, even if it was ruled incomplete they would have still just had to Hail Mary it.

Plus I am about as against that stupid rule as you could get anyway so if anything it represents the ones that should have been fumbles that were ruled incomplete.

(and if you have dvr you can see the defender gets his hands on the ball before the arm is even going forward)

Also like when cutler did that to us, why do they never call intentional grounding after those? Just because its ruled a pass instead of a fumble doesn't make it a legal pass.(the one in the denver game should have been grounding)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...