Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Auburn vs Oregon game thread


ncguy2184

Recommended Posts

there are obvious differences between dorsey and fairley. Fairley is 6 ft 5 and 300 pounds while dorsey was 300 pounds and only 6 ft 1. Fairley also has a longer wingspan with is very crucial for being a good NFL DT. But, Dorsey has improved every year in a 3-4 scheme..where he is really a 4-3 dt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far, Newton's playing kinda like i thought. I said in an earlier thread that he would have about 14 or more runs and pass the ball 27 times, it's likely that number increases, i was wrong however, on his rushing yards, they were worse for Newton (so far) and i am getting close to being correct on the passing, i said 280 or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but its just that he was a great SEC DT and I'm scared that fairley will end up being just like him.

Dorsey isn't a bad player. He had a lot of tackles his rookie year in a 4-3 scheme, then was victim to 3-4 change the next year in which he is miscast, and even still he holds his own. I'd like to have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True but its just that he was a great SEC DT and I'm scared that fairley will end up being just like him.

I'm not trying to be a douche or anything. But by using that kind logic one could say Cam Newton will be a great pro player because Peyton Manning didn't play all that well in his final bowl game either and they both played in the SEC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never compare Newton to Clausen. Clausen can't even throw the ball downfield without it being battered away by a defender.

yeah, while the other runs the ball way too much, sorry, but i dont want Newton if he continues to run the ball 15 or more times, he wont last all year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...