Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The New Charlie's Angles TV Reboot!!


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://www.masslive.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2011/01/meet_the_new_charlies_angels.html

9229277-large.jpg

A pilot starring Minka Kelly (“Friday Night Light”) Rachael Taylor (“Transformers”) and Annie Ilonzeh ("General Hospital") is under consideration at ABC.

Deadline.com is reporting that Ilonzeh has already been signed and Kelly and Taylor are close to inking deals to portray the trio of sexy detectives. Robert Wagner would supply the voice of their never-seen boss, Charlie.

The pilot would be a reboot of the 1976-1981 TV series, which originally starred Farrah Fawcett, Jaclyn Smith and Kate Jackson. The original voice of Charlie was that of John Forsythe.

The pilot is being produced by Sony Pictures TV and Drew Barrymore's Flower Films.

Barrymore starred with Cameron Diaz and Lucy Liu is a 2000 big screen remake.

Unlike the original ABC series, the new version is reportedly set in Miami instead of Los Angeles. Production is expected to begin as early as next month.

Oh man!! Could T'n'A TV be making a come back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God Dammit. One original idea, Hollywood, ONE! I dare you, I double dare you, I triple dog dare you to come up with one original idea.

I mean for fug sake, how many 70's and 80's era shows have been rebooted now? Compounded with the "Sassy single female lawyer" shows, four billion CSI and Law and Order spinoffs, and 20 billion reality shows. God, if I didn't have AMC (or Fox when House is on), I'd never watch TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...