Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

new TV advice?

cptx

By cptx,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

cptx Rising Star

cptx

Posted
Posted

So i'm looking for a new TV. I haven't decided on LCD or plasma, I just want my ps3 games and blu-ray's to look good on it. Maybe something in the 48/50 inch range at around $1200, give or take a couple hundred.

I've been using a RCA rear projection hdtv since '03, so it's starting to show a little were and tear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted

I personally can highly recommend this Samsung. According to Consumer reports nothing comes close to and the Vizio is next. I have this TV and have absolutely no complaints. You can get it for about the price you are looking for. (Just make sure you are getting the 550 and not an older version)

[ame]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0014175E8?ie=UTF8&tag=samsungln46a550p-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B0014175E8&gclid=CIWh9pCRzpgCFRadnAodqUQ41g[/ame]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Samsung has the 650 now...and beyond that I'm pretty sure, and they are 120hz. I like those but they won't fit into my entertainment center...so i'm going Sony. One day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Niner National Newbie

Niner National

Posted
Posted

Don't get a Vizio unless you like a dull, washed out image.

Don't spend extra money on a 120hz because it doesn't really make much difference and many tech reviews say no difference at all. The salesman will hype it up because he's likely making money off of your sale. I do it all the time when selling TV's to people because the more they spend, the more I make. Go either with a 60hz (the 550 is a nice one, but will run you 1500 on the low end for a 52") or plasma. Panasonic Plasmas and Samsung Plasmas are both very nice as well and are generally much cheaper than LCDs. They have a much higher refresh rate (480hz compared to 120hz for the fastest LCD's) and a much greater depth of color as their contrast ratios are usually 1,000,000:1 compared to 50,000:1 for the best LCD's on the market. On LCD's people generally look pale as though they've lost a pint of blood, but on most plasma's, you get more realistic colors. That being said, you won't notice in your home as it won't be sitting next to other televisions for comparison. The lifespans are the same these days and burn in is really a thing of the past unless you seriously neglect your television.

Look into LG, they have a 2 year full parts and labor warranty. Everyone else is only a 1 year warranty with 90 days labor. I'd recommend and extended service contract on any brand other than an LG since the manufacturer warranties with the other brands suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seamonk Enthusiast

Seamonk

Posted
Posted

I too am buying a TV very soon -- so I am looking at them too & doing all the research.

Tensor -- The 120hz rate I heard was vital for watching football is that not true?

Honestly... You won't notice a difference between 120hz until you get used to 120hz and then go back to 60hz. Typically 120hz is more useful for gaming than TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hmsmike Newbie

hmsmike

Posted
Posted

Honestly... You won't notice a difference between 120hz until you get used to 120hz and then go back to 60hz. Typically 120hz is more useful for gaming than TV.

Ok so it will not make a horrible picture watching racing or football?

Cool!

Gaming not an issue for "this" TV because the only game that it will be played is Wii stuff.

I am moving my 52" downstairs along with my Xbox360!! :thumbsup:

Man-cave about to get a whole lot better! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jgigs Newbie

Jgigs

Posted
Posted

Plasmas honestly scare me. They look nice, but that whole IR (image retention) / burn in is def NOT a thing of the past.

I know two people that have plasmas who have suffer from burn in. That's why I stuck with a LCD again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • mav1234
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By mav1234 · Posted

      At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • amcoolio
      Trade deadline

      By amcoolio · Posted

      Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...