Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teen hatchet killing suspect said overdose 'made me go mad


boo7382

Recommended Posts

wow, this is pretty crazy. This kid says he did it b/c of MucinexDM.....really?

A Kings Mountain teen accused of using a shotgun, handgun and hatchet to kill his roommate told a 911 dispatcher he had overdosed on cough medicine then gave grisly details of a killing.

Michael Joseph Anderson, 19, is charged with murder after deputies on Monday found the body of Stephen Starr, 36, inside Starr's home south of Hickory.

Authorities say Anderson called 911 early Monday saying he had killed and mutilated Starr, whom he claimed to have recently met at a club and moved in with. A word was carved into Starr's body, but authorities wouldn't say what it was.

On the 911 recording, a distraught-sounding man says: "I waited until he went to sleep and then I shot him three times, and then I mutilated him very badly, and I'm sorry."

The man also reports feeling conflicted after visiting a gay club, where he claims he met Starr.

The caller says he had ingested Mucinex DM, an over-the-counter cough suppressant that contains dextromethorphan. The FDA has issued warnings saying abuse of the drug is on the rise and can cause hallucinations and psychotic episodes.

On a Facebook page listed for Michael Joseph Anderson, postings minutes before the 911 call speaks of a killing.

"I WOULD RATHER WANT TO KILL ALOT MORE YOU KNOW BUT OH WELL ONE WILL DO I GUESS..."

Another post, says "i finally cracked guys i really did it this time guys."

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/02/16/2065725/suspect-in-killing-blames-cough.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I think happened was....

The suspect had his first gay sexual experience, and maybe felt violated and a little "butthurt" about it, and killed the guy IMO

thats kind of what I was thinking too...and the word on the dead guy...

starts with F, ends with AG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...