Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce stats past the sticks


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Complain when he doesn't throw to wide open receivers and complain when he does. You guys are making my head spin.

This one isn't me complaining, it's pointing out that we still missed an opportunity, I see them as very different things.

I gave the players and coaches their props yesterday, I enjoyed watching that game and enjoying the win.  But those things don't mean that I'm not going to ask questions when I see a stat like this and realize that even in a good win that I was happy with, there were still missed opportunities to help improve our players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, strato said:

I was afraid you would use Herm to miss the point, but I risked it because despite his record he was 100% right on that one. Congratulations. 

Your point was that you play to win the games.

My point was that that's a statement you make when you can't see the forest through the trees.

Yes, you do play to win the games, but you're also playing to win THE game, as in the Super Bowl.  And just playing to win the games at hand at the expense of getting better so you can contend for THE game, isn't a long term successful strategy, it's how franchises like ours are unable to have back to back winning seasons.

And Herm's career "success" in comparison to his quote is a picture perfect example of exactly that.  Just playing to win the game isn't going to help you down the line, it's immediate happiness for long term disappointment.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Your point was that you play to win the games.

My point was that that's a statement you make when you can't see the forest through the trees.

Yes, you do play to win the games, but you're also playing to win THE game, as in the Super Bowl.  And just playing to win the games at hand at the expense of getting better so you can contend for THE game, isn't a long term successful strategy, it's how franchises like ours are unable to have back to back winning seasons.

And Herm's career "success" in comparison to his quote is a picture perfect example of exactly that.  Just playing to win the game isn't going to help you down the line, it's immediate happiness for long term disappointment.

You aren’t going to convince me, this is circular. Let’s stop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...