Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Combine Thread


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

This will be where I do everything QB wise as I watch the combine. I'll post pertinent 40 and drill performances as well as commentary from the panel which right now is Mayock, Davis and Sterling Sharpe.

Freaky how big and athletic all these guys are.

Kaepernick is every bit the athlete that Newton is. 4.53 40

Locker 40 4.52 both attempts

Gabbert 4.63 and 4.61

All commentary is centering around size and athletesism of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gabbert 4.61

Kapernick 4.53

Locker 4.52 (3rd fastest time for a QB in the last 11 combines unofficial)

Mallet not running and nor should he :D

Dalton 4.86

Mayock again says Gabbart has a higher ceiling than any other QB in this draft.

A note on Kapernick, huge arm, great RPM's on the ball, threw for over 2000 yards and ran for over 1000 yards like 3 years in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be where I do everything QB wise as I watch the combine. I'll post pertinent 40 and drill performances as well as commentary from the panel which right now is Mayock, Davis and Sterling Sharpe.

Freaky how big and athletic all these guys are.

Kaepernick is every bit the athlete that Newton is. 4.53 40

Locker 40 4.52 both attempts

Gabbert 4.63 and 4.61

All commentary is centering around size and athletesism of these guys.

Kaepernick is really growing on me. Did it for 3 years in college, passed for over 2000 yards and rushed for 1000 yards for 3 years. A little raw but has all the tools and apparently the work ethic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm I'm not sure what to think about Cam Newton. I don't know if the FO is seriously considering or trying to pull off a big smokescreen. I know JR is meeting with him apparently.

If Cam is selected we will need to establish a game plan for him, for his talents, and for the fact that he will be a rookie. One positive I see with him is that he should be able to extend plays fairly easily. Which means Steve Smith, and Gettis will have plenty of time to break off routes and stretch the field. Should mean big numbers for Smitty again.

But the big problem with this is that we have seen that type of game before. We have seen the VY, Mike Vick(ATL) offense, which means it will be shut down and figured out eventually. And Cam will not be developed enough to shoulder the team like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because according to him it would be Gabbert.

Or Locker :rolleyes:

I would be happy as a lark if we drafted Gabbert. Doesn't bother me a bit. I like Cam more, but it is time to draft a QB and get it fixed.

BTW these guys on the NFL network are clueless. (Not Maycock).

They hardly know what QBs are in our division :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have completely pissed all over Josh Freeman the last two day. Called him the wrong name yesterday. Didn't know his first name. Then today they talk about the great QB's in our division. They said there are two good QB's in our division Ryan and Brees. Poor Josh. Dude is a top 12 QB in the league and just gets dissed

Fuggin clueless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...