Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Casual Sports Betting


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, toldozer said:

Had longest td for a series lol.  Oh well I made like a buck fifty on the game

Same, went 11 wins and 13 loses on stupid prop bets (gatorade, coin flip, bad bunny, etc).  Hit +300 on opening kickoff touchback, so that offset the 2 losses to pull me even.

But hit over 28.5 total in game live for the same $150.

On this today.  Will probably hedge Arizona if everything else goes to plan.

image.png.1483ea59cd6ee866c80e0acdb6d32628.png 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

Was traveling for work the past 6 days.  Haven't been on the books. 

On this currently.  

image.png.37c614881b364a66e0b3d05001c695d0.png

Another small one today that's looking solid although I forgot to add Newcastle actually winning the game lol. If I hit I'll probably throw profit on the inter game. Need 5 more shots on target in the game and 4 more Newcastle corners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

@toldozer moving soccer bet talk here, vs college hoops thread. 

Like Arsenal win, hoping Saka shot on goal came with some nice plus money.  He plays so wide and as a set up man.  Also possible he's subbed off for Madueke early in the second half. 

 

I like taking wingers because of the + money. At least a couple times a game they go selfish and try to go to frame instead of cross. Also bet365 has sub on play on so if he's subbed out it moves to the new player. It really is the best book

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

Horrible offsides call to negate Saka's shot on goal.  

Yeah, not sure why it's not reviewable for the corner. If he scored they would have given a good goal but because he didn't they don't review. Makes no sense. Also your cash out is a joke lol

Edited by toldozer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...