Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons to hire Stefanski


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, djp14 said:

I don't know their cap situation, but if they're able to pick up Malik Willis or Mac Jones, they could be trouble. Hell, they were only one game worse than us last year. If Cousins had played all season, who knows?

They are trouble because we have BY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Listen guys I’ve done my research. The guy who’s won coach of the year twice and took the Browns to the playoffs who got stuck with the Watson trade because the owner is moron is a bad hire for a team replacing Raheem morris.

time for some game theory. In this tweet I wil… (1/37)

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TD alt said:

We're about to find out. His offenses, even the ones with Baker were middling at best.

hes made the playoffs with 2 different qbs, and baker by his own admission was an immature douche during his time there.  I think once this dude gets his qb without meddling from the owner he will ascend.   Do I think he is an elite coach, probably not, but he is competent, knows what he is doing and is better than then have had

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TD alt said:

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

Dude its the browns and their owner that cant stay away.  Sound familiar? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

Just like Bryce, sanders needs a coach to unlock him like… 

/glances at who’d possibly want that job

…Brad Idzik

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

 

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

hes made the playoffs with 2 different qbs, and baker by his own admission was an immature douche during his time there.  I think once this dude gets his qb without meddling from the owner he will ascend.   Do I think he is an elite coach, probably not, but he is competent, knows what he is doing and is better than then have had

Perhaps you need to do research on he and Baker's relationship and why it soured. There was life before Watson. And, it's not like Stefanski helped Watson. Developing a QB is not Stefanski's strong point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

Canales’ offense with everything he has and the qb he was hired to work with was comparable across the board to what Cleveland did this year.

not really the flex you’re hoping for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

He has improved the offense?  And yeah man our roster is still piss poor due to the bryce trade and what we gave up.  I wouldnt be planting my flag just yet going 8-10 in a horrid division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...