Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons to hire Stefanski


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, djp14 said:

I don't know their cap situation, but if they're able to pick up Malik Willis or Mac Jones, they could be trouble. Hell, they were only one game worse than us last year. If Cousins had played all season, who knows?

They are trouble because we have BY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Listen guys I’ve done my research. The guy who’s won coach of the year twice and took the Browns to the playoffs who got stuck with the Watson trade because the owner is moron is a bad hire for a team replacing Raheem morris.

time for some game theory. In this tweet I wil… (1/37)

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TD alt said:

We're about to find out. His offenses, even the ones with Baker were middling at best.

hes made the playoffs with 2 different qbs, and baker by his own admission was an immature douche during his time there.  I think once this dude gets his qb without meddling from the owner he will ascend.   Do I think he is an elite coach, probably not, but he is competent, knows what he is doing and is better than then have had

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TD alt said:

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

Coach of the year doesn't really mean a damned thing if you can't follow it up with "coach of the year" results. Keep chirping your built-in apologist excuse for declining and sucking. Keep that same energy when he s ultimately fired.

Dude its the browns and their owner that cant stay away.  Sound familiar? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

Just like Bryce, sanders needs a coach to unlock him like… 

/glances at who’d possibly want that job

…Brad Idzik

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

He followed up coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2020 with…coach of the year and a playoff birth in 2023.

He wasn’t the one that ran off baker because someone wanted “an adult in the room” and acquired the rapist. 

 

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

hes made the playoffs with 2 different qbs, and baker by his own admission was an immature douche during his time there.  I think once this dude gets his qb without meddling from the owner he will ascend.   Do I think he is an elite coach, probably not, but he is competent, knows what he is doing and is better than then have had

Perhaps you need to do research on he and Baker's relationship and why it soured. There was life before Watson. And, it's not like Stefanski helped Watson. Developing a QB is not Stefanski's strong point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

with all the assets they gave away and then his poor play, is it a surprise they suck ass now starting guys like Sanders and Dillion?   

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

Canales’ offense with everything he has and the qb he was hired to work with was comparable across the board to what Cleveland did this year.

not really the flex you’re hoping for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

What did we give away, and we have Bryce? Yet, Canales still figured out a way to improve. 

He has improved the offense?  And yeah man our roster is still piss poor due to the bryce trade and what we gave up.  I wouldnt be planting my flag just yet going 8-10 in a horrid division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...