Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Union: No 18 game schedule


pantherfan81

Recommended Posts

I've heard that one of the major issues is the NFL not even putting the 18 game schedule on the table? Why, because in the previous CBA the players had already given the owners permission to move to a 18 game regular season as long as they reduce the preseason by 2 games.

To the owners, if they want 18 games then it will happen and they will not get permission from the players to do so. The players know this so every offer they are laying on the table includes no 18 game language.

I don't think we are going to see another NFL football game until fall 2012 at the earliest.

Even if true, the fact that the players gave permission in the old CBA is irrelevant. There will be a new agreement in place that governs everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if true, the fact that the players gave permission in the old CBA is irrelevant. There will be a new agreement in place that governs everything.

But the owners don't see it that way.

I am really starting to have a bad feeling that the end game is coming and that the owners may just do something drastic. This isn't 1965 anymore. The majority of the owners now aren't the same owners just trying to make a pro football league sustainable. These are ruthless businessmen that own a NFL team because they want to make as much money as possible.

I really question if the NFL will last beyond these negociations. In order to avoid any antitrust lawsuites all the NFL would have to do is discontinue operating soley as one league and begin operating like 32 seperate businesses. That means the end to the draft, free agency as we know it, salary cap ect. The NFL would only remain as a system for determining a championship. Owners could pay players as little as 7.25 a hour if they wanted to. It's drastic, and it wouldn't be a long term solution but I think the owners may see this as their own counter to the NFLPA decertifying.

Then the players would be forced to strike, then we would see replacement players come in so that the NFL could still get the network dollars.

I do not support this move, nor do I support the NFLPA decertifying. But this may very well be what happens I fear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard that one of the major issues is the NFL not even putting the 18 game schedule on the table? Why, because in the previous CBA the players had already given the owners permission to move to a 18 game regular season as long as they reduce the preseason by 2 games.

To the owners, if they want 18 games then it will happen and they will not get permission from the players to do so. The players know this so every offer they are laying on the table includes no 18 game language.

I don't think we are going to see another NFL football game until fall 2012 at the earliest.

The biggest winner if that happens would be the Carolina Panthers. We would have the first pick of every round in 2012, lots to work with concerning trades. (We would essentially be able to move up and down the boards at will.) Plus, we would be in prime position to select Luck, or trade him for a mass amount of picks. It would be a GM's dream come true. (I would take Luck, unless he pulls a diva move. Either way, we win big)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ^I want that, but Rodriguez over KC. Don't hate KC as much at that spot, but rather take a WR with the pick we gain in that trade than in the 1st. 
    • I think there is good points in this thread to what the team needs to do. 1) Ball isn't really the issue but, he needs reigned in.  Coach and he need to realize when things aren't falling from the three and learn to play other facets of the game.  He's an amazing talent and when he's on, he's on.  But he can also shoot you out of a game.  We're lucky Miami went that way but that is too many missed threes.  He still needs to bulk up if he can, but he needs to drive more.  He's pretty good at finishing usually and hopefully the fouls come (probably not though).   2) The whole team needs to be more physical.  As others have stated, we need more bulk in our bigs.  Diabate is a hurricane of energy but cannot go against the larger centers.  I love him on the team but he should be more of a match up type guy or energy off the bench.  I think he'd be insane off the bench.  However I think the biggest issue with Diabate and Kaulk is the lack of offensive game.  The lack of a jump shot or anything.  Teams figured out to just leave them on the screen and crash lanes.  There has to be some sort of threat.  We need a 4 and a 5 that can do those things and stretch out the court. 3) Bridges.  He's just undersized.  However, I feel he really threw his all into it the last few weeks when others were gassed.  He was ok not being a focal point.  I'd like to have him off the bench as well but I assume he'd be traded to make things work.  4) Miller.  Dude can light it up when on, but disappears for quarters at a time.  Also he needs to work on ball handling and passing.  He's a turnover machine at bad times.  Also hopefully over the injury so he can bulk up too.   5) Kon. Just a rookie.  Long season and back injury.  I have no doubt he'll be back stronger and focused.  Needs to work on defense and physicality like the whole team but yes, a rookie he'll get there. 6) Coby.  Has to be resigned, no question.  The bench lineup is rough without him running the point.  Team has big potential and the front office seems sharp.  They seen the hive and how crazy it got and how much the city wants this.  
×
×
  • Create New...